IPv6 Enterprise Network Analysis - IP Layer 3 Focus
draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-07
Yes
(David Kessens)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
David Kessens Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-06-05)
Unknown
The reference [V6DEF] is not filled in (referenced in section 5), nor is [DNSV6REC], [NIS], [DHCPv4], [ADDRCONF], [IPSEC] or [PRIVv6]. I wish the "works in progress" references had pointers (like [DNSV6]), are they not Internet Drafts? "At the time of writing, best practice in IPv6 site address planning is restricted due to limited wide-scale deployments." Does this mean "At the time of writing, solid details on best practice in IPv6 address planning is restricted..."? I am pretty sure it doesn't mean that the applicability of best practice is limited...
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain
(2006-06-21)
Unknown
I think this document fails to meet many of it's goals. I don't think it will help an enterprise figure out how to transition to v6 - there is so many critical things it does not mention, like applications that run on hosts. I have a hard time imagining any easy way to fix it.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Abstain
Abstain
(2006-12-11)
Unknown
The response to my DISCUSS position was much lighter than I had hoped. I do not think the point is worth further delay. I have changed my position to ABSTAIN.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain
(2006-06-06)
Unknown
This document rules so many important things out of scope--nat used for V4, firewalls, application issues--that it is useless in my mind. The best I can say is that I don't think it will do any harm.