Vehicular Mobility Management for IP-Based Vehicular Networks
draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management-01
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jaehoon Paul Jeong , Yiwen Chris Shen , Zhong Xiang | ||
| Last updated | 2019-07-08 (Latest revision 2019-03-28) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | plain text xml htmlized pdfized bibtex | ||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management-01
IPWAVE Working Group J. Jeong
Internet-Draft Y. Shen
Intended status: Standards Track Z. Xiang
Expires: January 9, 2020 Sungkyunkwan University
July 8, 2019
Vehicular Mobility Management for IP-Based Vehicular Networks
draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management-01
Abstract
This document specifies a Vehicular Mobility Management (VMM) scheme
for IP-based vehicular networks. The VMM scheme takes advantage of a
vehicular link model based on a multi-link subnet. With a vehicle's
mobility information (e.g., position, speed, and direction) and
navigation path (i.e., trajectory), it can provide a moving vehicle
with proactive and seamless handoff along with its trajectory.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 9, 2020.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Vehicular Network Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Vehicular Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Mobility Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.1. Network Attachment of a Vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. Handoff within One Prefix Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.3. Handoff between Multiple Prefix Domains . . . . . . . . . 10
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Appendix A. Changes from draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-
management-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Appendix B. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1. Introduction
This document proposes a mobility management scheme for IP-based
vehicular networks, which is called Vehicular Mobility Management
(VMM). The VMM is tailored for a vehicular network architecture and
a vehicular link model described in the IPWAVE problem statement
document [I-D.IPWAVE-PS].
To support the interaction between vehicles or between vehicles and
Rode-Side Units (RSUs), Vehicular Neighbor Discovery (VND) is
proposed as an enhanced IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) for IP-based
vehicular networks [I-D.IPWAVE-VND]. For an efficient IPv6 Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) [RFC4862], VND adopts an optimized
Address Registration using a multihop Duplicate Address Detection
(DAD). This multihop DAD enables a vehicle to have a unique IP
address in a multi-link subnet that consists of multiple wireless
subnets with the same IP prefix, which corresponds to wireless
coverage of multiple RSUs. Also, VND supports IP packet routing via
a connected Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) by letting vehicles
exchange the prefixes of their internal networks through their
external wireless interface.
The mobility management in this multi-link subnet needs a new
approach from legacy mobility management schemes. This document aims
at an efficient mobility management scheme called VMM to support
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
efficient V2V, V2I, and V2X communications in a road network. The
VMM takes advantage of the mobility information (e.g., a vehicle's
speed, direction, and position) and trajectory (i.e., navigation
path) of each vehicle registered into a Traffic Control Center (TCC)
in the vehicular cloud.
2. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
3. Terminology
This document uses the terminology described in [RFC4861] and
[RFC4862]. In addition, the following new terms are defined as
below:
o DMM: Acronym for "Distributed Mobility Management"
[RFC7333][RFC7429].
o Mobility Anchor (MA): A node that maintains IP addresses and
mobility information of vehicles in a road network to support
their address autoconfiguration and mobility management with a
binding table. It has end-to-end connections with RSUs under its
control.
o On-Board Unit (OBU): A node that has a network interface (e.g.,
IEEE 802.11-OCB and Cellular V2X (C-V2X) [TS-23.285-3GPP]) for
wireless communications with other OBUs and RSUs, and may be
connected to in-vehicle devices or networks. An OBU is mounted on
a vehicle. It is assumed that a radio navigation receiver (e.g.,
Global Positioning System (GPS)) is included in a vehicle with an
OBU for efficient navigation.
o OCB: Acronym for "Outside the Context of a Basic Service Set"
[IEEE-802.11-OCB].
o Road-Side Unit (RSU): A node that has physical communication
devices (e.g., IEEE 802.11-OCB and C-V2X) for wireless
communications with vehicles and is also connected to the Internet
as a router or switch for packet forwarding. An RSU is typically
deployed on the road infrastructure, either at an intersection or
in a road segment, but may also be located in car parking areas.
o Traffic Control Center (TCC): A node that maintains road
infrastructure information (e.g., RSUs, traffic signals, and loop
detectors), vehicular traffic statistics (e.g., average vehicle
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
speed and vehicle inter-arrival time per road segment), and
vehicle information (e.g., a vehicle's identifier, position,
direction, speed, and trajectory as a navigation path). TCC is
included in a vehicular cloud for vehicular networks.
o Vehicular Cloud: A cloud infrastructure for vehicular networks,
having compute nodes, storage nodes, and network nodes.
o WAVE: Acronym for "Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments"
[WAVE-1609.0].
4. Vehicular Network Architecture
This section describes a vehicular network architecture for V2V and
V2I communication. A vehicle and an RSU have their internal networks
including in-vehicle devices or servers, respectively.
4.1. Vehicular Network
A vehicular network architecture for V2I and V2V is illustrated in
Figure 1. In this figure, there is a vehicular cloud having a TCC.
The TCC has Mobility Anchors (MAs) for the mobility management of
vehicles under its control. Each MA is in charge of the mobility
management of vehicles under its prefix domain, which is a multi-link
subnet of RSUs sharing the same prefix [I-D.IPWAVE-PS]. A vehicular
network is a wireless network consisting of RSUs and vehicles. RSUs
are interconnected with each other through a wired network, and
vehicles can construct VANETs via V2V and V2I communications.
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
*-----------------------------------------*
* TCC in Vehicular Cloud *
* +-------------------------------------+ *
+--------+ * | +---------+ +---------+ | *
| CN1 |<---->* | | MA1 |<------->| MA2 | | *
+--------+ * | +---------+ +---------+ | *
* +-------------------------------------+ *
* ^ ^ *
* | INTERNET | *
*---------v--------------------v----------*
^ ^ ^
| Ethernet | |
| | |
v v v
+--------+ Ethernet +--------+ Ethernet +--------+
| RSU1 |<-------->| RSU2 |<-------->| RSU3 |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+
^ ^ ^
: : :
+-----------------------------------+ +-----------------+
| : V2I V2I : | | V2I : |
| v v | | v |
+--------+ | +--------+ +--------+ | | +--------+ |
|Vehicle1|===> |Vehicle2|===> |Vehicle3|===> | | |Vehicle4|===> |
| |<.....>| |<.....>| | | | | | |
+--------+ V2V +--------+ V2V +--------+ | | +--------+ |
| | | |
+-----------------------------------+ +-----------------+
Subnet1 Subnet2
<----> Wired Link <....> Wireless Link ===> Moving Direction
Figure 1: A Vehicular Network Architecture for V2I and V2V Networking
In Figure 1, three RSUs are deployed either at intersections or along
roadways. They are connected to an MA through wired networks. In
the vehicular network, there are two subnets such as Subnet1 and
Subnet2. Subnet1 is a multi-link subnet consisting of multiple
wireless coverage areas of multiple RSUs, and those areas share the
same IPv6 prefix to construct a single logical subnet
[I-D.IPWAVE-PS]. That is, the wireless links of RSU1 and RSU2 belong
to Subnet1. Thus, since Vehicle2 and Vehicle3 use the same prefix
for Subnet1 and they are within the wireless communication range,
they can communicate directly with each other. Note that in a multi-
link subnet, a vehicle (e.g., Vehicle2 and Vehicle3 in Figure 1) can
configure its global IPv6 address through an address registration
procedure including a multihop DAD, which is specified in VND
[I-D.IPWAVE-VND].
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
On the other hand, Subnet2 uses a prefix different from Subnet1's.
Vehicle4 residing in Subnet2 cannot talk to Vehicle3 directly because
they belong to different subnets. Vehicles can construct a connected
VANET, so they can communicate with each other without the relaying
of an RSU, but the forwarding over the VANET. In the case where two
vehicles belong to the same multi-link subnet, but they are not
connected in the same VANET, they can use RSUs. In Figure 1, even
though Vehicle1 are disconnected from Vehicle3, they can communicate
indirectly with each other through RSUs such as RSU1 and RSU2.
In Figure 1, it is assumed that Vehicle2 communicates with the
corresponding node denoted as CN1 where Vehicle2 is moving in the
wireless coverage of RSU1. When Vehicle2 moves out of the coverage
of RSU1 and moves into the coverage of RSU2 where RSU1 and RSU2 share
the same prefix, the packets sent by CN1 should be routed toward
Vehicle2. Also, when Vehicle2 moves out of the coverage of RSU2 and
moves into the coverage of RSU3 where RSU2 and RSU3 use two different
prefixes, the packets of CN1 should be delivered to Vehicle2. With a
handoff procedure, a sender's packets can be delivered to a
destination vehicle which is moving in the wireless coverage areas.
Thus, this document specifies a mobility management scheme in the
vehicular network architecture, as shown in Figure 1.
5. Mobility Management
This section explains the detailed procedure of mobility management
of a vehicle in a vehicular network as shown in Figure 1.
5.1. Network Attachment of a Vehicle
A mobility management is required for the seamless communication of
vehicles moving between the RSUs. When a vehicle moves into the
coverage of another RSU, a different IP address is assigned to the
vehicle, resulting in the re-configuration of transport-layer session
information (i.e., an end-point's IP address) to avoid service
disruption. Considering this issue, this document proposes a handoff
mechanism for seamless communication.
In [VIP-WAVE], the authors constructed a network-based mobility
management scheme using Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) [RFC5213], which
is highly suitable for vehicular networks. This document uses a
mobility management procedure similar to PMIPv6 along with prefix
discovery.
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
Vehicle RSU MA
| | |
|-RS with Mobility Info->| |
| [VMI] | |
| | |
| |--------PBU------>|
| | |
| | |
| |<-------PBA-------|
| | |
| | |
| |===Bi-Dir Tunnel==|
| | |
| | |
|<----RA with prefix-----| |
| | |
Figure 2: Message Interaction for a Vehicle's Network Attachment
Figure 2 shows the binding update flow when a vehicle entered the
subnet of an RSU. RSUs act as Mobility Anchor Gateway (MAG) defined
in [VIP-WAVE]. When it receives an RS message from a vehicle
containing its mobility information (e.g., position, speed, and
direction), an RSU sends its MA a Proxy Binding Update (PBU) message
[RFC5213][RFC3775], which contains a Mobility Option for the
vehicle's mobility information. The MA receives the PBU and sets up
a Binding Cache Entry (BCE) as well as a bi-directional tunnel
(denoted as Bi-Dir Tunnel in Figure 2) between the serving RSU and
itself. Through this tunnel, all traffic packets to the vehicle are
encapsulated toward the RSU. Simultaneously, the MA sends back a
Proxy Binding Acknowledgment (PBA) message to the serving RSU. This
serving RSU receives the PBA and sets up a bi-directional tunnel with
the MA. After this binding update, the RSU sends back an RA message
to the vehicle, which includes the RSU's prefix for the address
autoconfiguration of the vehicle.
When the vehicle receives the RA message, it performs the address
registration procedure including a multihop DAD for its global IP
address based on the prefix announced by the RA message according to
the VND [I-D.IPWAVE-VND].
In PMIPv6, a unique prefix is allocated to each vehicle by an MA
(i.e., LMA) to guarantee the uniqueness of each address, but in this
document, a unique IP address is allocated to each vehicle with the
same prefix by an MA in its domain through the multihop-DAD-based
address registration. This unique IP address allocation ensures that
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
vehicles own unique IP addresses in a multi-link subnet and can
reduce the waste of IP prefixes in legacy PMIPv6.
5.2. Handoff within One Prefix Domain
When the vehicle changes its location and its current RSU (denoted as
c-RSU) detects that the vehicle is moving out of its coverage, c-RSU
needs to report the leaving of the vehicle to the MA and de-register
the binding via PBU.
Vehicle c-RSU MA n-RSU
| | | |
| |===Bi-Dir Tunnel==| |
| | | |
| | | |
| |----DeReg PBU---->| |
| | | |
| | | |
| |<-------PBA-------| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|(------------------RS with Mobility Info-------------->)|
| [VMI] | |
| |<-------PBU-------|
| | |
| | |
| |--------PBA------>|
| | |
| | |
| |===Bi-Dir Tunnel==|
| | |
| | |
|<--------------------RA with prefix---------------------|
| |
Figure 3: Handoff of a Vehicle within One Prefix Domain with PMIPv6
With this report, the MA can figure out the new RSU (denoted as
n-RSU) based on the vehicle's trajectory and change the end-point of
the tunnel into n-RSU's IP address for the vehicle or get ready to
detect new binding requests.
Figure 3 shows the handoff of a vehicle within one prefix domain
(i.e., a multi-link subnet) with PMIPv6. As shown in the figure,
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
when the MA receives a new PBU from the n-RSU, it changes the
tunnel's end-point from the c-RSU to n-RSU. If there are ongoing IP
packets toward the vehicle, the MA encapsulates the packets and then
forwards them towards n-RSU. Through this network-based mobility
management, the vehicle is not aware of any changes at its network
layer and can maintain its transport-layer sessions without any
disruption.
Vehicle c-RSU n-RSU
| | |
|---------------------| |
|c-RSU detects leaving| |
|---------------------| |
| |--------PBU------>|
| | |
| |===Bi-Dir Tunnel==|
| | |
| |<-------PBA-------|
| | |
| | |
|(--------RS with Mobility Info-------->)|
| [VMI] |
| |
|<------------RA with prefix-------------|
| |
Figure 4: Handoff of a Vehicle within One Prefix Domain with DMM
If c-RSU and n-RSU are adjacent, that is, vehicles are moving in
specified routes with fixed RSU allocation, the procedure can be
simplified by constructing the bidirectional tunnel directly between
them (cancel the intervention of MA) to alleviate the traffic flow in
MA as well as reduce handoff delay.
Figure 4 shows the handoff of a vehicle within one prefix domain (as
a multi-link subnet) with DMM [I-D.DMM-PMIPv6]. RSUs are in charge
of detecting when a node joins or moves through its domain. If c-RSU
detects that the vehicle is going to leave its coverage and to enter
the area of an adjacent RSU, it sends a PBU message to inform n-RSU
of the handoff of the vehicle. If n-RSU receives the PBU message, it
constructs a bidirectional tunnel between c-RSU and itself, and then
sends back a PBA message as an acknowledgment to c-RSU. If there are
ongoing IP packets toward the vehicle, c-RSU encapsulates the packets
and then forwards them to n-RSU. When n-RSU detects the entrance of
the vehicle, it directly sends an RA message to the vehicle so that
the vehicle can assure that it is still connected to a router with
its current prefix. If the vehicle sends an RS message to n-RSU,
n-RSU responds to the RS message by sending an RA to the vehicle.
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
5.3. Handoff between Multiple Prefix Domains
When the vehicle moves from a prefix domain to another prefix domain,
a handoff between multiple prefix domains is required. As shown in
Figure 1, when Vehicle3 moves from the subnet of RSU2 (i.e., Subnet1)
to the subnet of RSU3 (i.e., Subnet2), a multiple domain handoff is
performed through the cooperation of RSU2, RSU3, MA1 and MA2.
Vehicle c-RSU MA1 MA2 n-RSU
| | | | |
| |==Bi-Dir Tunnel==| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |---DeReg PBU---->| | |
| | |-------PBU----->| |
| | | | |
| |<------PBA-------| |-------PBA------>|
| | | | |
| | | |==Bi-Dir Tunnel==|
| | | | |
| | | | |
|(----------------------RS with Mobility Info------------------->)|
| | |[VMI] | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|<----------------------RA with prefix1 (c-RSU)-------------------|
| | | | |
|<----------------------RA with prefix2 (n-RSU)-------------------|
| | | | |
Figure 5: Handoff of a Vehicle between Multiple Prefix Domains with
PMIPv6
Figure 5 shows the handoff of a vehicle between two prefix domains
(i.e., two multi-link subnets) with PMIPv6. When the vehicle moves
out of its c-RSU belonging to Subnet1, and moves into the n-RSU
belonging to Subnet2, c-RSU detects the vehicle's leaving and reports
to MA1. MA1 figures out that the vehicle will get into the coverage
of the n-RSU based on its trajectory and sends MA2 a PBU message to
inform MA2 that the vehicle will enter the coverage of n-RSU
belonging to MA2. MA2 sends n-RSU a PBA message to inform n-RSU that
the vehicle will enter the coverage of n-RSU along with handoff
context such as c-RSU's context information (e.g., c-RSU's link-local
address and prefix called prefix1), and the vehicle's context
information (e.g., the vehicle's global IP address and MAC address).
After n-RSU receives the PBA message including the handoff context
from MA2, it sets up a bi-directional tunnel with MA2, and generates
RA messages with c-RSU's context information. That is, n-RSU
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
pretends to be a router belonging to Subnet1. When the vehicle
receives RA from n-RSU, it can maintain its connection with its
corresponding node (i.e., CN1). Note that n-RSU also sends RA
messages with its domain prefix called prefix2. The vehicle
configures another global IP address with prefix2, and can use it for
communication with neighboring vehicles under the coverage of n-RSU.
If c-RSU and n-RSU are adjacent, that is, vehicles are moving in
specified routes with fixed RSU allocation, the procedure can be
simplified by constructing the bidirectional tunnel directly between
them (cancel the intervention of MAs) to alleviate the traffic flow
in MA as well as reduce handoff delay.
Vehicle c-RSU n-RSU
| | |
|---------------------| |
|c-RSU detects leaving| |
|---------------------| |
| |--------PBU------>|
| | |
| |===Bi-Dir Tunnel==|
| | |
| |<-------PBA-------|
| | |
| | |
|(--------RS with Mobility Info-------->)|
| [VMI] |
| |
|<--------RA with prefix1 (c-RSU)--------|
| |
|<--------RA with prefix2 (n-RSU)--------|
| |
Figure 6: Handoff of a Vehicle within Multiple Prefix Domains with
DMM
Figure 6 shows the handoff of a vehicle within two prefix domains (as
two multi-link subnets) with DMM [I-D.DMM-PMIPv6]. If c-RSU detects
that the vehicle is going to leave its coverage and to enter the area
of an adjacent RSU (n-RSU) belonging to a different prefix domain, it
sends a PBU message to inform n-RSU that the vehicle will enter the
coverage of n-RSU along with handoff context such as c-RSU's context
information (e.g., c-RSU's link-local address and prefix called
prefix1), and the vehicle's context information (e.g., the vehicle's
global IP address and MAC address). After n-RSU receives the PBA
message including the handoff context from c-RSU, it sets up a bi-
directional tunnel with c-RSU, and generates RA messages with c-RSU's
context information. That is, n-RSU pretends to be a router
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
belonging to Subnet1. When the vehicle receives RA from n-RSU, it
can maintain its connection with its corresponding node (i.e., CN1).
Note that n-RSU also sends RA messages with its domain prefix called
prefix2. The vehicle configures another global IP address with
prefix2, and can use it for communication with neighboring vehicles
under the coverage of n-RSU.
6. Security Considerations
This document shares all the security issues of Vehicular ND
[I-D.IPWAVE-VND], Proxy MIPv6 [RFC5213], and DMM
[RFC7333][RFC7429][I-D.DMM-PMIPv6].
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3775] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support
in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.
[RFC4861] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman,
"Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861,
September 2007.
[RFC4862] Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration", RFC 4862, September 2007.
[RFC5213] Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., and K.
Chowdhury, "Proxy Mobile IPv6", RFC 5213, August 2008.
[RFC7333] Chan, H., Liu, D., Seite, P., Yokota, H., and J. Korhonen,
"Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management",
RFC 7333, August 2014.
[RFC7429] Liu, D., Zuniga, JC., Seite, P., Chan, H., and CJ.
Bernardos, "Distributed Mobility Management: Current
Practices and Gap Analysis", RFC 7429, January 2015.
7.2. Informative References
[I-D.DMM-PMIPv6]
Bernardos, CJ., Oliva, A., Giust, F., Zuniga, JC., and A.
Mourad, "Proxy Mobile IPv6 extensions for Distributed
Mobility Management", draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04 (work
in progress), January 2019.
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
[I-D.IPWAVE-PS]
Jeong, J., Ed., "IP Wireless Access in Vehicular
Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases",
draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-09 (work in
progress), May 2019.
[I-D.IPWAVE-VND]
Jeong, J., Ed., Shen, Y., and Z. Xiang, "Vehicular
Neighbor Discovery for IP-Based Vehicular Networks",
draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-neighbor-discovery-07 (work
in progress), July 2019.
[IEEE-802.11-OCB]
"Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications", IEEE Std
802.11-2016, December 2016.
[TS-23.285-3GPP]
3GPP, "Architecture Enhancements for V2X Services", 3GPP
TS 23.285, June 2018.
[VIP-WAVE]
Cespedes, S., Lu, N., and X. Shen, "VIP-WAVE: On the
Feasibility of IP Communications in 802.11p Vehicular
Networks", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation
Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, March 2013.
[WAVE-1609.0]
IEEE 1609 Working Group, "IEEE Guide for Wireless Access
in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) - Architecture", IEEE Std
1609.0-2013, March 2014.
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
Appendix A. Changes from draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-
management-00
The following changes are made from draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-
mobility-management-00:
o In Section 4.1, the description of the vehicular network
architecture is clarified.
o In Section 5.2, the description on the handoff procedure within
one prefix domain is clarified.
o In Section 5.3, the decription on the the handoff procedure within
multiple prefix domains is clarified.
o Some typo errors are corrected and the repeated acronyms are
removed.
Appendix B. Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of
Education (2017R1D1A1B03035885).
This work was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT),
Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center)
support program (IITP-2019-2017-0-01633) supervised by the IITP
(Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion).
Authors' Addresses
Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University
2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu
Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 16419
Republic of Korea
Phone: +82 31 299 4957
Fax: +82 31 290 7996
EMail: pauljeong@skku.edu
URI: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Vehicular Mobility Management July 2019
Yiwen Chris Shen
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University
2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu
Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 16419
Republic of Korea
Phone: +82 31 299 4106
Fax: +82 31 290 7996
EMail: chrisshen@skku.edu
Zhong Xiang
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Sungkyunkwan University
2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu
Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 16419
Republic of Korea
Phone: +82 10 9895 1211
Fax: +82 31 290 7996
EMail: xz618@skku.edu
Jeong, et al. Expires January 9, 2020 [Page 15]