Nominating Committee Process: Incumbent Review Model
draft-klensin-nomcom-incumbents-first-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dr. John C. Klensin , Spencer Dawkins | ||
| Last updated | 2009-07-13 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The traditional IETF Nomcom model treats incumbents and new nominees (for the same and other positions) as equivalent. This has not proven realistic in practice and has had a number of undesirable side effects. This document reviews the issues and the specific changes to the model that take advantage of the differences between incumbents and new nominees.
Authors
Dr. John C. Klensin
Spencer Dawkins
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)