Terms of Appointments for NomCom-selected IETF Leadership Positions
draft-klensin-nomcom-term-01
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Spencer Dawkins , Dr. John C. Klensin | ||
| Last updated | 2006-06-23 (Latest revision 2005-07-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
A consensus is emerging in the IETF that very long tenure in leadership roles is not in the best interests of the community. While, in theory, that advice could simply be given to the NomCom, there is reason to believe that a different model for consideration of renewal or replacement for members of the leadership would be more efficient for the NomCom and would impose less hardship on incumbents and the community. This document outlines that alternate method.
Authors
Spencer Dawkins
Dr. John C. Klensin
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)