The Location "On Behalf Of" Model is Broken
draft-linsner-geopriv-obo-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Marc Linsner | ||
| Last updated | 2008-07-07 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There is proposed solution submitted to the GeoPriv work group that outlines the need for a location recipient to obtain the location of a target without the target's knowledge. The scenario is described as supporting a legacy device (a device lacking support for location) for the purposes of utilizing location when the legacy device summons emergency help (by dialing 911/112, etc.). Below is a discussion of the of the general topic of discovering location via 'On Behalf Of' or OBO.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)