Operational management of Loop Free Alternates
draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2013-08-22 (latest revision 2013-02-18)
Replaced by draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01.txt

Abstract

Loop Free Alternates (LFA), as defined in RFC 5286 is an IP Fast ReRoute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic (and MPLS LDP traffic by extension). Following first deployment experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFA, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. This proposal is also applicable to remote LFA solution.

Authors

Stephane Litkowski (stephane.litkowski@orange.com)
Bruno Decraene (bruno.decraene@orange.com)
Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil@cisco.com)
Kamran Raza (skraza@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)