IMAP4 Extension to SEARCH Command for Controlling What Kind of Information Is Returned
draft-melnikov-imap-search-ret-03
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 4731.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dave Cridland , Alexey Melnikov | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2006-06-12) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 4731 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Ted Hardie | ||
| Send notices to | dave.cridland@clues.ltd.uk |
draft-melnikov-imap-search-ret-03
Internet Draft A. Melnikov
Document: draft-melnikov-imap-search-ret-03 Isode Ltd
Expires: December 2006 D. Cridland
Inventure Systems Ltd
June 2006
IMAP4 extension to SEARCH command for controlling what kind of
information is returned
draft-melnikov-imap-search-ret-03
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
A revised version of this draft document will be submitted to the
RFC editor as a Standard Track RFC for the Internet Community.
Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested, and
should be sent to ietf-imapext@imc.org and/or lemonade@ietf.org.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document extends IMAP (RFC 3501) SEARCH and UID SEARCH
commands with several result options, which can control what kind
of information is returned. The following result options are
defined: minimal value, maximal value, all found messages and
number of found messages.
Table of Contents
1. Conventions Used in this Document 2
2. Introduction 3
3. IMAP Protocol Changes 3
3.1 SEARCH/UID SEARCH Commands 3
4. Formal Syntax 6
5. Security Considerations 7
6. IANA Considerations 7
7. References 7
7.1 Normative References 7
7.2 Informative References 8
8. Acknowledgments 8
9. Author's Addresses 8
10. Full Copyright Statement 8
11. Intellectual Property 9
12. Appendix A. Editorial. 9
12.1 Change Log 9
12.2 Open Issues for Discussion 10
1. Conventions Used in this Document
In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
server respectively.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [KEYWORDS].
<<Editorial comments and questions are enclosed like this>>
2. Introduction
[IMAPABNF] extended SEARCH and UID SEARCH commands with result
specifiers (also known as result options), which can control what
kind of information is returned.
A server advertising the X-DRAFT-I02-ESEARCH <<fix before
publication>> capability supports the following result options:
minimal value, maximal value, all found messages and number of
found messages. These result options allows clients to get SEARCH
results in more convenient forms, while also saving bandwidth
required to transport the results, for example finding the first
unseen message or returning the number of unseen or deleted
messages. Also, when a single MIN or a single MAX result option is
specified, servers can optimize execution of SEARCHes.
3. IMAP Protocol Changes
3.1 New SEARCH/UID SEARCH result options
The SEARCH/UID SEARCH commands are extended to allow for the
following result options:
MIN
Return the lowest message number/UID that satisfies the
SEARCH criteria.
If the SEARCH results in no matches, the server MUST NOT
include the MIN result option in the ESEARCH response,
however it still MUST send the ESEARCH response.
MAX
Return the highest message number/UID that satisfies the
SEARCH criteria.
If the SEARCH results in no matches, the server MUST NOT
include the MAX result option in the ESEARCH response,
however it still MUST send the ESEARCH response.
ALL
Return all message numbers/UIDs that satisfy the SEARCH
criteria. Unlike regular (unextended) SEARCH, the messages
are always returned using the sequence-set syntax. A sequence-
set representation may be more compact and can be used as is
in a subsequent command that accepts sequence-set.
Note, the client MUST NOT assume that messages/UIDs will be
listed in any particular order.
If the SEARCH results in no matches, the server MUST NOT
include the ALL result option in the ESEARCH response,
however it still MUST send the ESEARCH response.
COUNT
Return number of the messages that satisfy the SEARCH
criteria. This result option MUST always be included in the
ESEARCH response.
If one or more result option described above is specified, the
extended SEARCH command MUST return a single ESEARCH response
[IMAPABNF], instead of the SEARCH response.
An extended UID SEARCH command MUST cause a ESEARCH response with
the UID indicator present.
Note that future extensions to this document can allow servers to
return multiple ESEARCH responses for a single extended SEARCH
command. These extensions will have to describe how results from
multiple ESEARCH responses are to be amalgamated.
If the list of result options is empty, that requests the server to
return an ESEARCH response instead of the SEARCH response. This is
equivalent to "(ALL)".
Example: C: A282 SEARCH RETURN (MIN COUNT) FLAGGED
SINCE 1-Feb-1994 NOT FROM "Smith"
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A282") MIN 2 COUNT 3
S: A282 OK SEARCH completed
Example: C: A283 SEARCH RETURN () FLAGGED
SINCE 1-Feb-1994 NOT FROM "Smith"
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A283") ALL 2,10:11
S: A283 OK SEARCH completed
The following example demonstrates finding the first unseen message
as returned in the UNSEEN response code on a successful SELECT
command:
Example: C: A284 SEARCH RETURN (MIN) UNSEEN
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A284") MIN 4
S: A284 OK SEARCH completed
The following example demonstrates that if the ESEARCH UID
indicator is present, all data in the ESEARCH response is referring
to UIDs, for example the MIN result specifier will be followed by
an UID.
Example: C: A285 UID SEARCH RETURN (MIN MAX) 1:5000
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A285") UID MIN 7 MAX 3800
S: A285 OK SEARCH completed
The following example demonstrates returning the number of deleted
messages:
Example: C: A286 SEARCH RETURN (COUNT) DELETED
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A286") COUNT 15
S: A286 OK SEARCH completed
3.2 Interaction with CONDSTORE extension
When the server supports both the X-DRAFT-I02-ESEARCH <<fix before
publication>> and the CONDSTORE [CONDSTORE] extension, and the
client requests one or more result option described in section 3.1
together with the MODSEQ search criterion in the same SEARCH/UID
SEARCH command, then the server MUST return the ESEARCH response
containing the MODSEQ result option (described in the following
paragraph) instead of the extended SEARCH response described in
section 3.5 of [CONDSTORE].
If the SEARCH/UID SEARCH command contained a single MIN or MAX
result option, the MODSEQ result option contains the mod-sequence
for the found message. If the SEARCH/UID SEARCH command contained
both MIN and MAX result options and no ALL/COUNT option, the MODSEQ
result option contains the highest mod-sequence for the two
returned messages. Otherwise the MODSEQ result option contains the
highest mod-sequence for all messages being returned.
Example: The following example demonstrates how Example 15 from
[CONDSTORE] would look in the presence of one or more result
option:
C: a1 SEARCH RETURN (MIN) MODSEQ "/flags/\\draft"
all 620162338
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "a1") MIN 2 MODSEQ 917162488
S: a1 OK Search complete
C: a2 SEARCH RETURN (MAX) MODSEQ "/flags/\\draft"
all 620162338
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "a2") MAX 23 MODSEQ 907162321
S: a2 OK Search complete
C: a3 SEARCH RETURN (MIN MAX) MODSEQ "/flags/\\draft"
all 620162338
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "a3") MIN 2 MAX 23 MODSEQ 917162488
S: a3 OK Search complete
C: a4 SEARCH RETURN (MIN COUNT) MODSEQ "/flags/\\draft"
all 620162338
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "a4") MIN 2 COUNT 10 MODSEQ 917162500
S: a4 OK Search complete
4. Formal Syntax
The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [ABNF].
Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by
[IMAP4], [CONDSTORE] or [IMAPABNF].
Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-
insensitive. The use of upper or lower case characters to define
token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations MUST
accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.
capability =/ "X-DRAFT-I02-ESEARCH"
search-return-data = "MIN" SP nz-number /
"MAX" SP nz-number /
"ALL" SP sequence-set /
"COUNT" SP number
;; conforms to the generic
;; search-return-data syntax defined
;; in [IMAPABNF]
search-return-opt = "MIN" / "MAX" / "ALL" / "COUNT"
;; conforms to generic search-return-opt
;; syntax defined in [IMAPABNF]
When the CONDSTORE [CONDSTORE] IMAP extension is also supported
the ABNF is updated as follows:
search-return-data =/ "MODSEQ" SP mod-sequence-value
;; mod-sequence-value is defined
;; in [CONDSTORE]
5. Security Considerations
In general case IMAP SEARCH/UID SEARCH command can be CPU and/or IO
intensive, so some sites/implementations even disable it entirely.
This is quite unfortunate, as SEARCH command is one of the best
examples demonstrating IMAP advantage over POP3.
The ALL and COUNT return options don't change how SEARCH is working
internally, they only change how information about found messages
is returned. MIN and MAX SEARCH result options described in this
document can lighten load on IMAP servers, which chose to optimize
SEARCHes containing only one or both of them.
It is believed that this extension doesn't raise any additional
security concerns not already discussed in [IMAP4].
6. IANA Considerations
IMAP4 capabilities are registered by publishing a standards track
or IESG approved experimental RFC. The registry is currently
located at
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities>.
This document defines the X-DRAFT-I02-ESEARCH <<fix before
publication>> IMAP capability. IANA is requested to add this
capability to the registry.
7. References
7.1 Normative References
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.
[IMAP4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version
4rev1", RFC 3501, University of Washington, March 2003.
[ABNF] Crocker, D. (Ed.) and P. Overell , "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
[IMAPABNF] Melnikov, A. and C. Daboo, "Collected extensions to
IMAP4 ABNF", RFC 4466, April 2006..
[CONDSTORE] Melnikov, A. and S. Hole, "IMAP Extension for
Conditional STORE", RFC 4551, June 2006.
8. Acknowledgments
Thanks to Michael Wener, Arnt Gulbrandsen, Cyrus Daboo, Mark
Crispin and Pete Maclean for comments and corrections.
9. Author's Addresses
Alexey Melnikov
Isode Limited
5 Castle Business Village
36 Station Road
Hampton, Middlesex, TW12 2BX
UK
Email: Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com
Dave A. Cridland
Inventure Systems Limited
Email: dave.cridland@inventuresystems.co.uk
URL: http://invsys.co.uk/dave/
10. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on
an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT
THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR
ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
11. Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described
in this document or the extent to which any license under such
rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that
it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights.
Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC
documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
12. Appendix A. Editorial.
<<Note to RFC editor: please delete this section before
publication>>
12.1 Change Log
00 Initial Revision.
01 Added search correlator. Clarified what should be returned if an
extended SEARCH produces no matches. Filled in "IANA
considerations" section. Updated references: updated ABNF and
added [IMAPABNF]. Changed semantics of the empty list of result
options (now equivalent to "(ALL)".
02 Clarified that clients can expect a single ESEARCH result to any
extended SEARCH command (for result options described in this
document). Added more text on intended purpose of the extension.
Added more examples. Updated reference to the ABNF document.
03 Clarified interaction with CONDSTORE. Multiple editorial changes
to align with [IMAPABNF].