Diversion with No Transport Overhead
draft-morrow-mipv6-zod-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Glenn Morrow | ||
| Last updated | 2002-01-28 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Under certain circumstances the desired effects of diversion can be achieved with no per-packet transport overhead. This draft describes these circumstances as well as the per-packet bearer processing and general signaling requirements of some proposals that strive to remove the need for this overhead. The first proposal is referred to as Zero-Overhead Diversion (ZOD). The second is referred to as More Robust Zero-Overhead Diversion (MR. ZOD). Mobile IP and load distribution are examples of the useful application of diversion.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)