Dream-Pipe or Pipe-Dream: What Do Users Want (and how can we assure it)?
draft-morton-ippm-pipe-dream-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Al Morton | ||
| Last updated | 2022-03-21 (Latest revision 2021-09-06) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo addresses the problem of defining relevant properties and metrics with the goal of improving Internet access for all users. Where the fundamental metrics are well-defined, a framework to standardize new metrics exists and been used with success. Users consider reliability to be important, as well as latency and capacity; it really depends who you ask and their current experiences.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)