Enhanced PPP link re-establishment using context transfer
draft-nakhjiri-seamoby-ppp-ct-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Madjid Nakhjiri , Shreesha Ramanna | ||
Last updated | 2002-12-02 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Many of today’s networks use PPP as a means of providing access links to remote users. In case a PPP user is mobile and performs a subnet handover, it needs to tear down and re-establish of its PPP link with the network. PPP link re-establishment is an elaborate procedure (as explained in a later section of this document) involving multiple messages. This will lead in an extended service disruption as due to the round trip time involved in the messaging as well extensive radio bandwidth usage. Of this reason, we consider PPP to be a prime candidate for context transfer [1-3]. The proposal in this document can reduce the number of PPP establishment messages by 50%-100. Furthermore, it will save significant amount of time in PPP state machine transitions, due to the multiphase nature of PPP. Reliability and timing issues of PPP context transfer are also discussed.
Authors
Madjid Nakhjiri
Shreesha Ramanna
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)