Skip to main content

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Bulk Update/Replication Protocol (LBURP)
draft-rharrison-lburp-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2005-11-07
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-10-31
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-10-31
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-10-31
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-10-28
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2005-10-28
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-10-27
2005-10-27
05 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-10-27
05 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-10-26
05 Michelle Cotton IANA Follow-up comments:
IANA's questions from Last Call have been answered.
2005-10-24
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2005-10-20
05 Ted Hardie Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-10-27 by Ted Hardie
2005-10-11
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2005-10-11
05 (System) New version available: draft-rharrison-lburp-05.txt
2005-09-29
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-09-29
05 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-09-29
05 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2005-09-29
05 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
inconsistency:

!! Missing Reference for citation: [X.680]
  P003 L035:    [X.680] message types specified in [RFC2251].

!! Missing citation for …
[Ballot comment]
inconsistency:

!! Missing Reference for citation: [X.680]
  P003 L035:    [X.680] message types specified in [RFC2251].

!! Missing citation for Normative reference:
  P012 L017:    [X680]    International Telecommunications Union, "Abstract Syntax
2005-09-29
05 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-09-29
05 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2005-09-29
05 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-09-29
05 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-09-28
05 Michelle Cotton
IANA Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign a LDAP Object Identifier in the following registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers under the Prefix: iso.org.dod.internet.directory (1.3.6.1.1.) …
IANA Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will assign a LDAP Object Identifier in the following registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers under the Prefix: iso.org.dod.internet.directory (1.3.6.1.1.)
For the 7 registrations under this OID, are these protocol mechanisms or Descriptors?  IANA needs clarification as to where these should be placed in the registry as well as what the type will be for these.
These will be placed in one of the registries found at the following:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters
2005-09-28
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The first paragraph of the Security Considerations needs to
  discuss authentication as well as authorization.  How can the
  authorization decision be …
[Ballot discuss]
The first paragraph of the Security Considerations needs to
  discuss authentication as well as authorization.  How can the
  authorization decision be made without first performing
  identification and authentication?

  The Security Considerations include:
  >
  > The data contained in the update stream may contain passwords and
  > other sensitive data.  Care should be taken to properly safeguard
  > this information while in transit between supplier and consumer.
  >
  This is justification for confidentiality and integrity protections.
  How should they be provided?  If two LDAP servers in the same room
  are using this protocol for replication, it is probably not a big
  deal.  However, if the two servers are on different continents, then
  a security protocol is needed.  Any suggestions?  TLS?
2005-09-28
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-09-23
05 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-09-21
05 Ted Hardie Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-09-29 by Ted Hardie
2005-09-21
05 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Ted Hardie
2005-09-21
05 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie
2005-09-21
05 Ted Hardie Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie
2005-09-21
05 Ted Hardie Created "Approve" ballot
2005-09-03
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2005-09-03
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2005-09-02
05 Ted Hardie State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Ted Hardie
2005-09-02
05 Ted Hardie Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie
2005-09-02
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-09-02
05 (System) Last call text was added
2005-09-02
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-09-02
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2005-09-02
04 (System) New version available: draft-rharrison-lburp-04.txt
2005-02-10
05 Ted Hardie Roger confirms that this draft is in a nearly finaly state, and that he will have
an update shortly after IETF 62.
2005-02-10
05 Ted Hardie State Change Notice email list have been change to from , ,
2003-03-24
05 Ted Hardie Shepherding AD has been changed to Hardie, Ted from Faltstrom, Patrik
2002-10-29
05 Patrik Fältström
New version needed which handle editorial nits. Has passed external review in LDAP Directorate.

Also, some clarification of how this I-D relates to LDUP WG …
New version needed which handle editorial nits. Has passed external review in LDAP Directorate.

Also, some clarification of how this I-D relates to LDUP WG work may be appropriate.
2002-10-29
05 Patrik Fältström Intended Status has been changed to Informational from Request
2002-10-29
05 Patrik Fältström State Changes to AD Evaluation  -- Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by paf
2002-05-08
05 Jacqueline Hargest Assigned to has been changed to paf from members
by jhargest
2001-03-06
03 (System) New version available: draft-rharrison-lburp-03.txt
2000-06-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-rharrison-lburp-02.txt
2000-03-16
01 (System) New version available: draft-rharrison-lburp-01.txt
1999-10-14
00 (System) New version available: draft-rharrison-lburp-00.txt