Skip to main content

An HTTP Status Code to Report Requester Impairment
draft-richardroda-420requesterimpaired-04

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Richard Roda
Last updated 2023-12-12
Replaces draft-richardroda-420operatorimpaired
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-richardroda-420requesterimpaired-04
HTTP                                                        R. Roda, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                          12 December 2023
Intended status: Informational                                          
Expires: 14 June 2024

           An HTTP Status Code to Report Requester Impairment
               draft-richardroda-420requesterimpaired-04

Abstract

   This document specifies a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) status
   code for use when an operation or resource is denied due to requester
   impairment.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 June 2024.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Roda                      Expires 14 June 2024                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft    HTTP Requester Impairment Status Code    December 2023

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  420 Requester Impaired  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   This document specifies a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) status
   code for use when a request is denied because the requester is
   impaired.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  420 Requester Impaired

   The status code 420 indicates that the server is denying the request
   as a consequence of evidence of requester impairment.

   The server in question might not be an origin server.  An
   intermediate proxy closer to the requester may be in a better
   position to assess potential requester impairment.  Such a proxy may
   refuse to forward the request and respond with this error code.

   There is no requirement that the requester be human.  Certain AI
   systems can exhibit behaviors such as giving hallucinated, incorrect,
   and differing answers for a given input.

   420 responses MUST include a Link header [RFC8288] with a relation
   type of "status".  This link is used by the remediated requester to
   obtain information about the server state and to signal to the server
   that the requester is remediated.  Requesters SHOULD use this link
   when remediated before making subsequent requests unless a bearer
   token is used as described under Section 4 and the server does not
   require usage of the link.

Roda                      Expires 14 June 2024                  [Page 2]
Internet-Draft    HTTP Requester Impairment Status Code    December 2023

   A 420 response is non-cacheable by default, i.e., unless otherwise
   indicated by the method definition or explicit cache controls; see
   [RFC9111].

   AI
      An artificial intelligence system that is capable of making
      independent decisions without direct human control.

   proxy
      A server with a primary purpose of forwarding requests to other
      servers to process.

   HTTP/1.1 420 Requester Impaired
   Link: <https://example.com/impaired/remediated>; rel="status"
   Content-Type: application/problem+json
   Content-Language: en
   {
       "type": "https://example.com/erratic-requests",
       "title": "Requester Impaired: Erratic Behavior Detected.",
       "detail": "Erratic requests detected."
   }

       Figure 1: Example Response in [RFC9457] Problem Details Format

3.  IANA Considerations

   IANA is asked to update the HTTP Status Codes Registry with the
   following entry:

   *  Code: 420

   *  Description: Requester Impaired

   *  Specification: This RFC

4.  Security Considerations

   The usage of the link resource provided by the Link header to assert
   requester remediation assumes a requester or proxy that is
   trustworthy enough to halt requests and only access the link resource
   after requester remediation.  If greater security is required,
   perhaps to enable an external system to remediate and validate the
   requester, a server MAY require an OAuth authorization [RFC7523]
   bearer token [RFC6750] to signal remediation of the requester.

   If a valid bearer token is required and missing, further requests
   SHOULD be rejected with a 403 Forbidden response code with the
   insufficient_scope error code and scope attribute naming the

Roda                      Expires 14 June 2024                  [Page 3]
Internet-Draft    HTTP Requester Impairment Status Code    December 2023

   authorization token required as described in [RFC6750] section 3.1.
   Once this authorization bearer token is validated the server MAY
   allow requests without using the Link provided in the 420 response,
   but MUST NOT respond to usage of the link as an error.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC9111]  Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
              Ed., "HTTP Caching", STD 98, RFC 9111,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9111, June 2022,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9111>.

   [RFC9457]  Nottingham, M., Wilde, E., and S. Dalal, "Problem Details
              for HTTP APIs", RFC 9457, DOI 10.17487/RFC9457, July 2023,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9457>.

   [RFC8288]  Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 8288,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8288, October 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8288>.

   [RFC7523]  Jones, M., Campbell, B., and C. Mortimore, "JSON Web Token
              (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and
              Authorization Grants", RFC 7523, DOI 10.17487/RFC7523, May
              2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7523>.

   [RFC6750]  Jones, M. and D. Hardt, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization
              Framework: Bearer Token Usage", RFC 6750,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6750, October 2012,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6750>.

Author's Address

   Richard Roda (editor)
   Email: richard_roda@hotmail.com
   URI:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/richardroda/

Roda                      Expires 14 June 2024                  [Page 4]