The Jabber-ID Header Field
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 7259.
|Last updated||2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-03-03)|
|RFC stream||Independent Submission|
|IETF conflict review||conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid, conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid, conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid, conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid, conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid, conflict-review-saintandre-jabberid|
|Stream||ISE state||Published RFC|
|IESG||IESG state||RFC 7259 (Informational)|
|Send notices email@example.com|
|IANA||IANA review state||Version Changed - Review Needed|
|IANA action state||RFC-Ed-Ack|
Network Working Group P. Saint-Andre Internet-Draft &yet Intended status: Informational March 4, 2014 Expires: September 5, 2014 The Jabber-ID Header Field draft-saintandre-jabberid-13 Abstract This document defines a header field that enables the author of an email or netnews message to include a Jabber ID in the message header block for the purpose of associating the author with a particular Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) address. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on September 5, 2014. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Saint-Andre Expires September 5, 2014 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Jabber-ID March 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Inclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.2. Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.3. Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.4. Disposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Security and Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. Introduction The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), documented in [RFC6120], is a streaming XML technology that enables any two entities on a network to exchange well-defined but extensible XML elements (called "XML stanzas") in close to real time. Given XMPP's heritage in the Jabber open-source community, one of the primary uses for XMPP is instant messaging and presence as documented in [RFC6121], and XMPP addresses are still referred to as Jabber IDs. Because almost all human users of Jabber/XMPP instant messaging and presence systems also use email systems [RFC5322] and because many also use netnews systems [RFC5536], it can be helpful for them to associate their Jabber IDs with the messages they author. The Jabber-ID header field provides a standard location for that information. Members of the XMPP instant messaging and presence community have been experimenting with the Jabber-ID header field for many years. This document defines the syntax and usage of the Jabber-ID header field, including the information necessary to register the field in the Provisional Message Header Field Registry maintained by the IANA. 2. Syntax The syntax of the Jabber-ID header field is defined below using Augmented Backus-Naur Form [RFC5234], where the "pathxmpp" rule is defined in the XMPP URI specification [RFC5122] and the remaining rules are defined in the Internet Message Format specification [RFC5322]: Saint-Andre Expires September 5, 2014 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Jabber-ID March 2014 Jabber-ID = SP *WSP pathxmpp *WSP CRLF Although a native XMPP address can contain virtually any Unicode character [UNICODE], the header of an email or netnews message is allowed to contain only printable ASCII characters (see Section 2 of [RFC5322]). Therefore, any characters outside the ASCII range [RFC20] in an XMPP address need to be converted to ASCII before inclusion in a Jabber-ID header field, in accordance with the rules defined in the XMPP URI specification [RFC5122]. In addition, characters allowed in XMPP localparts and XMPP resourceparts but disallowed by the relevant URI rules need to be percent-encoded in accordance with the rules defined in the URI specification [RFC3986]. 3. Usage 3.1. Inclusion The Jabber-ID header field is associated with the author of the message; see [RFC5322]. If the "From:" header field of an email message contains more than one mailbox, it is best not to add the Jabber-ID header field to the message. To reduce the possibility of confusion, it is best to include only one instance of the Jabber-ID header field in a given message. 3.2. Generation For a user whose XMPP address is "firstname.lastname@example.org", the corresponding Jabber-ID header field would be: Jabber-ID: email@example.com As noted, non-ASCII characters in XMPP addresses need to be converted into ASCII before inclusion in a Jabber-ID header field. Consider the following XMPP address: jiři@čechy.example In the foregoing example, the string "ř" stands for the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON and the string "č" stands for the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON, following the "XML Notation" used in [RFC3987] to represent characters that cannot be rendered in ASCII-only documents. For those who do not read Czech, this example could be Anglicized as "firstname.lastname@example.org". Following the rules in [RFC5122] and the Jabber-ID header field syntax, the resulting header field might be as shown below (note that Saint-Andre Expires September 5, 2014 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Jabber-ID March 2014 this representation includes folding white space, which is allowed in accordance with the ABNF): Jabber-ID: ji%C5%99i@%C4%8Dechy.example 3.3. Processing Upon receiving an email message or netnews message containing a Jabber-ID header field, a user agent that supports the field ought to process the field by converting any escaped characters to characters outside the ASCII range in accordance with the rules defined in [RFC5122], thus yielding a Jabber ID that can be used for native communication on the XMPP network. 3.4. Disposition A user agent that has processed a Jabber-ID header field can provide appropriate interface elements if it has independent information linking the author of the email or netnews message with the specified Jabber ID (e.g., via a user-controlled address book or automated directory lookup). Such interface elements might include an indicator of "presence" (i.e., that the author is online and available for communication via XMPP) if the user is subscribed to the presence of the author, and an element that enables the user to send an instant message or initiate a text chat session with the author. 4. IANA Considerations The IANA includes "Jabber-ID" in the Provisional Message Header Field Names Registry. The completed registration template follows. Header field name: Jabber-ID Applicable protocol: mail, netnews Status: provisional Author/Change contoller Peter Saint-Andre <mailto:email@example.com> Specification document: RFC XXXX Related information: See RFC 6120 [[Note to IANA: The Provisional Message Header Field Names Registry currently includes an entry for "Jabber-ID", with a reference to Saint-Andre Expires September 5, 2014 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Jabber-ID March 2014 draft-saintandre-jabberid-08. Please update the registry entry to refer to "RFC XXXX", where "XXXX" is the number of the RFC that results from this specification.]] [[Note to RFC Editor: Please replace "XXXX" with the number of the RFC that results from this specification. Please remove this note, along with the foregoing note, upon publication.]] 5. Security and Privacy Considerations Message headers are an existing standard and are designed to easily accommodate new types. Although the Jabber-ID header field could be forged, this problem is inherent in Internet email and netnews; however, because a forged Jabber-ID header field might break automated processing, applications are discouraged from depending on the Jabber-ID header field to indicate the authenticity of an email or netnews message, or the identity of its author or sender. Including the Jabber-ID header field among the signer header fields in DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) can help to mitigate against forging of the header (see [RFC6376]). Advertising XMPP addresses in email or netnews headers might make it easier for malicious users to harvest XMPP addresses and therefore to send unsolicited bulk communications to the users or applications represented by those addresses. Providing such a binding between an email address and a Jabber ID can also increase the possibility of drawing a connection between different kinds of communications traffic for purposes of surveillance and other breaches of privacy. Care ought to be taken in balancing the benefits of open information exchange against the potential costs of security and privacy weaknesses. An email or netnews user agent that is capable of including the Jabber-ID header field in outgoing email or netnews messages needs to provide an option for its user to disable inclusion of the Jabber-ID header field generally, on a per-recipient basis, and on a per-message basis. The security and privacy considerations discussed in [RFC3986], [RFC3987], [RFC5122], [RFC6120], and [RFC6121] also apply to the Jabber-ID message header. 6. References 6.1. Normative References [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005. Saint-Andre Expires September 5, 2014 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Jabber-ID March 2014 [RFC3987] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005. [RFC5122] Saint-Andre, P., "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)", RFC 5122, February 2008. [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. [RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322, October 2008. [RFC6120] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, March 2011. [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version 6.3", 2013, <http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.3.0/>. 6.2. Informative References [RFC20] Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", RFC 20, October 1969. [RFC5536] Murchison, K., Lindsey, C., and D. Kohn, "Netnews Article Format", RFC 5536, November 2009. [RFC6121] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence", RFC 6121, March 2011. [RFC6376] Crocker, D., Hansen, T., and M. Kucherawy, "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", RFC 6376, September 2011. Appendix A. Acknowledgements Thanks to Dave Cridland, Stephen Farrell, Russ Housley, and Alexey Melnikov for their feedback. Author's Address Peter Saint-Andre &yet Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Saint-Andre Expires September 5, 2014 [Page 6]