Skip to main content

Associated Gateway Exchange in Multi-segment SD-WAN
draft-sheng-idr-gw-exchange-in-sd-wan-02

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Cheng Sheng , Hang Shi , Linda Dunbar , Gyan Mishra
Last updated 2024-02-29
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-sheng-idr-gw-exchange-in-sd-wan-02
Inter-Domain Routing                                            C. Sheng
Internet-Draft                                               H. Shi, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track                                  Huawei
Expires: 1 September 2024                                      L. Dunbar
                                                               Futurewei
                                                               G. Mishra
                                                                 Verizon
                                                        29 February 2024

          Associated Gateway Exchange in Multi-segment SD-WAN
                draft-sheng-idr-gw-exchange-in-sd-wan-02

Abstract

   The document describes the control plane enhancement for multi-
   segment SD-WAN to exchange the associated GW information between
   edges.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the Inter-Domain Routing
   Working Group mailing list (idr@ietf.org), which is archived at
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/VMatrix1900/draft-sheng-idr-gw-exchange-in-sd-wan.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 1 September 2024.

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft       Gateway Info Exchange in SDWAN        February 2024

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Extension to SD-WAN Underlay UPDATE for Associated GWs  . . .   4
     3.1.  NLRI SD-WAN SAFI Route Type For GW  . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Associated GW Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Manageability Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6

1.  Introduction

   [I-D.draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan] describes how enterprises
   leverage Cloud Providers’ backbone infrastructure to interconnect
   their branch offices.  As illustrated in Figure 1, CPE-1 and CPE-2
   establish connections to their respective Cloud Gateways (GW) in
   distinct regions.  CPE-1 and CPE-2 maintain the pairwise IPsec
   Security Associations (SAs).  The IPsec encrypted traffic from CPE-1
   to CPE-2 is encapsulated by the GENEVE header [RFC8926], with the
   outer destination address being the GW1.

   [I-D.draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan] specifies a set of sub-TLVs
   to convey information about the GWs associated with the destination
   branches, such as GW3 for CPE-2, along with additional attributes.
   To accomplish this, CPE-1 must be aware of the associated GW
   addresses of their peers.  This document proposes a BGP extension,
   building upon [I-D.draft-ietf-idr-sdwan-edge-discovery], enabling a
   CPE to advertise its directly connected GW address to other CPEs .

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft       Gateway Info Exchange in SDWAN        February 2024

     (^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^)
     (            Region2             )
     (            +-----+             )
     (            | GW2 |             )
     (            +-----+             )
     (           /       \            )
     (          /  Cloud  \           )
     (         /  Backbone \          )
     ( Region1/             \Region3  )
     ( +-----+               +-----+  )
     ( | GW1 |---------------| GW3 |  )
     ( +--+--+               +--+--+  )
     (^^^^|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|^^^^^)
          |                     |
       +--+--+               +--+--+
       |CPE 1|               |CPE 2|
       +-----+               +-----+

                       Figure 1: Multi-segment SD-WAN

2.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

   The following acronyms and terms are used in this document:

   *  Cloud DC: Off-Premises Data Center, managed by 3rd party, that
      hosts applications, services, and workload for different
      organizations or tenants.

   *  CPE: Customer (Edge) Premises Equipment.

   *  OnPrem: On Premises data centers and branch offices.

   *  RR Route Reflector.

   *  SD-WAN: Software Defined Wide Area Network.  In this document,
      “SD-WAN” refers to a policy-driven transporting of IP packets over
      multiple underlay networks for better WAN bandwidth management,
      visibility, and control.

   *  VPN Virtual Private Network.

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft       Gateway Info Exchange in SDWAN        February 2024

3.  Extension to SD-WAN Underlay UPDATE for Associated GWs

   The Client Routes Update is the same as described in Section 5 of
   [I-D.draft-ietf-idr-sdwan-edge-discovery].

3.1.  NLRI SD-WAN SAFI Route Type For GW

   Adding a new attribute (Associated-Gateway Sub-TLV) to the SD-WAN-
   Hybrid Tunnel Encoding which is included in the SD-WAN SAFI (=74)
   Underlay Tunnel Update:

   +------------------+
   |    Route Type    | 2 octet
   +------------------+
   |     Length       | 2 Octet
   +------------------+
   |   Type Specific  |
   ~ Value (Variable) ~
   |                  |
   +------------------+

   NLRI Route-Type = 2: For advertising the detailed properties of the
   transit gateways for the edge.  The SD-WAN NLRI Route-Type =2 has the
   following encoding:

   +------------------+
   |  Route Type = 2  | 2 octet
   +------------------+
   |     Length       | 2 Octet
   +------------------+
   |   SD-WAN Color   | 4 octets
   +------------------+
   |  SD-WAN-Node-ID  | 4 or 16 octets
   +------------------+

   SD-WAN-Color: To represent a group of tunnels that correlate with the
   Color-Extended-community included in a client route UPDATE.  When
   multiple SD-WAN edges can reach a client route co-located at one
   site, the SD-WAN- Color can represent a group of tunnels terminated
   at those SD-WAN edges co-located at the site, which effectively
   represents the site.

   SD-WAN Node ID: The node's IPv4 or IPv6 address.

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft       Gateway Info Exchange in SDWAN        February 2024

3.2.  Associated GW Sub-TLV

   The Associated GW Sub-TLV, within the SD-WAN-Hybrid Tunnel TLV (code
   point 25), carries the associated GW address(es) with which the SD-
   WAN edge is associated.

   The following is the structure of the associated GW Sub-TLV:

       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |               Type=TBD    |    length     |  Priority         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Associated GW Addr Family     | Address                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (variable)                    +
      ~                                                               ~
      |             Associated GW Address                             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Priority (1-255) indicate the preference of the GW.  The higher the
   value, the more preference is the GW.

   Priority = 0 represents that the connection exists but request Cloud
   Backbone not to choose the GW if possible.

4.  Manageability Considerations

   Effective management of SD-WAN edge nodes and the exchange of
   associated cloud gateway information are critical aspects in ensuring
   a robust and scalable SD-WAN deployment.

5.  Security Considerations

   This document does not introduce any new security considerations.

6.  IANA Considerations

   Need IANA to assign a new Sub-TLV Type under the SD-WAN-Hybrid Tunnel
   TLV.

   - SD-WAN Associated GW Sub-TLV.

7.  Normative References

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft       Gateway Info Exchange in SDWAN        February 2024

   [I-D.draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan]
              Majumdar, K., Dunbar, L., Kasiviswanathan, V., and A.
              Ramchandra, "Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud DCs", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-
              sdwan-07, 31 May 2023,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dmk-rtgwg-
              multisegment-sdwan-07>.

   [RFC8926]  Gross, J., Ed., Ganga, I., Ed., and T. Sridhar, Ed.,
              "Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation",
              RFC 8926, DOI 10.17487/RFC8926, November 2020,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8926>.

   [I-D.draft-ietf-idr-sdwan-edge-discovery]
              Dunbar, L., Hares, S., Raszuk, R., Majumdar, K., Mishra,
              G. S., and V. Kasiviswanathan, "BGP UPDATE for SD-WAN Edge
              Discovery", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
              idr-sdwan-edge-discovery-12, 23 June 2023,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-
              sdwan-edge-discovery-12>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

Authors' Addresses

   Cheng Sheng
   Huawei
   Beiqing Road
   Beijing
   Email: shengcheng@huawei.com

   Hang Shi (editor)
   Huawei
   Beiqing Road
   Beijing
   China
   Email: shihang9@huawei.com

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft       Gateway Info Exchange in SDWAN        February 2024

   Linda Dunbar
   Futurewei
   Email: linda.dunbar@futurewei.com

   Gyan Mishra
   Verizon
   Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com

Sheng, et al.           Expires 1 September 2024                [Page 7]