IPv6 Prefix Delegation routing state maintenance approaches

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2006-10-09
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at


The maintenance of Prefix Delegation (PD) routing state is an issue that people have discussed in the IETF DHC WG, and there have been drafts on the topic. However, as the pros and cons of the different routing state maintenance solutions have not been examined thoroughly, this text attempts to shed some light on both the actual problem and the various alternative solutions.


Markus Stenberg (mstenber@cisco.com)
Ole Trøan (ot@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)