IPv6 Prefix Delegation routing state maintenance approaches
draft-stenberg-v6ops-pd-route-maintenance-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Markus Stenberg , Ole Trøan | ||
| Last updated | 2007-12-10 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The maintenance of Prefix Delegation (PD) routing state is an issue that people have discussed in the IETF DHC WG, and there have been drafts on the topic. However, as the pros and cons of the different routing state maintenance solutions have not been examined thoroughly, this text attempts to shed some light on both the actual problem and the various alternative solutions.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)