Comparison of ATM encapsulation formats in pwe3
draft-walsh-pwe3-atm-compare-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Thomas Walsh | ||
| Last updated | 2002-06-24 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Different encapsulation formats have been proposed to carry ATM services over IP, L2TP and MPLS [2], [3], [4]. The cell mode proposals are discussed in [2] and [3]. The frame mode proposals are discussed in [2] and [4]. This paper analyzes certain key issues in these proposals and makes some conclusions.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)