Analysis of Security Association for Current Routing Protocols
draft-wei-karp-analysis-rp-sa-03
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Changsheng Wan , Hongyan Wang , Xiaoping Liang , Yinxing Wei | ||
| Last updated | 2012-04-28 (Latest revision 2011-10-26) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document analyzes the security associations used by current routing protocols, including RIPv2, OSPFv2, ISIS, BFD, BGP, OSPFv3, PCE, LDP, LMP, MSDP, RSVP-TE, PIM, and BGP. It also discusses the possible approach to the diversity issue of routing protocol security associations.
Authors
Changsheng Wan
Hongyan Wang
Xiaoping Liang
Yinxing Wei
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)