Skip to main content

Initial Assignment for the Content Security Policy Directives Registry
draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-01-28
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2016-01-26
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2016-01-18
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2015-12-09
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2015-12-08
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2015-11-29
04 Gunter Van de Velde Closed request for Last Call review by OPSDIR with state 'No Response'
2015-11-24
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors
2015-11-23
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2015-11-23
04 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2015-11-23
04 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2015-11-20
04 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2015-11-20
04 Mike West IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2015-11-20
04 Mike West New version available: draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-04.txt
2015-11-19
03 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation
2015-11-19
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2015-11-19
03 Amy Vezza Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2015-11-19
03 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Not sure if this is a concern or not.
Disclaimer: I have no background on content security policy directives.

The IANA registry is …
[Ballot comment]
Not sure if this is a concern or not.
Disclaimer: I have no background on content security policy directives.

The IANA registry is based on

  [CSP]      West, M. and D. Veditz, "Content Security Policy", n.d.,
              .


I wonder if this [CSP] is stable content?
From the web site, I see
    Content Security Policy Level 3
    Editor’s Draft, 6 November 2015

3 = version?
Editor's draft? Doesn't sound like stable.

The text in draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-03 considers [CSP] as stable
Ex: It populates the registry with the directives defined in the CSP specification.


Also
      The following table contains the initial values for this registry:

                      +-----------------+-----------+
                      | Directive Name  | Reference |
                      +-----------------+-----------+
                      | base-uri        | [CSP]    |
                      | child-src      | [CSP]    |
                      | connect-src    | [CSP]    |
                      | default-src    | [CSP]    |
                      | font-src        | [CSP]    |
                      | form-action    | [CSP]    |
                      | frame-ancestors | [CSP]    |
                      | frame-src      | [CSP]    |
                      | img-src        | [CSP]    |
                      | media-src      | [CSP]    |
                      | object-src      | [CSP]    |
                      | plugin-types    | [CSP]    |
                      | report-uri      | [CSP]    |
                      | sandbox        | [CSP]    |
                      | script-src      | [CSP]    |
                      | style-src      | [CSP]    |
                      +-----------------+-----------+


Bottom line:
1. should the CSP reference mention?
        Content Security Policy Level 3
        Editor’s Draft, 6 November 2015
2. should the document title mention "Initial assignment for Content Security Policy Directive Registry"?
2015-11-19
03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2015-11-18
03 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2015-11-18
03 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
I'm balloting "yes", but I share Stephen's question about a stable reference for CSP. I note the referenced version is marked "draft" and …
[Ballot comment]
I'm balloting "yes", but I share Stephen's question about a stable reference for CSP. I note the referenced version is marked "draft" and warns that it may change.
2015-11-18
03 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2015-11-18
03 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2015-11-17
03 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2015-11-17
03 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2015-11-17
03 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2015-11-16
03 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2015-11-16
03 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2015-11-16
03 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Is the github.io reference for CSP the best one? When I go
there it says http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP3/ is the "latest"
version but that URL …
[Ballot comment]

Is the github.io reference for CSP the best one? When I go
there it says http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP3/ is the "latest"
version but that URL gives me a 404. The W3C home page leads
to http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/ which I guess is a previous
incarnation of this (albeit from July). I'd suggest that it
might be nice to the reader to include a few of those as
references and to explain (in a sentence) what's what.
2015-11-16
03 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2015-11-12
03 Barry Leiba Ballot has been issued
2015-11-12
03 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2015-11-12
03 Barry Leiba Created "Approve" ballot
2015-11-12
03 Barry Leiba Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-11-19
2015-11-12
03 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2015-11-09
03 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2015-10-22
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Robert Sparks.
2015-10-19
03 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Stefan Winter
2015-10-19
03 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Stefan Winter
2015-10-16
03 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2015-10-16
03 Amanda Baber
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has completed its review of draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-03. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please contact us.

IANA understands …
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has completed its review of draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-03. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please contact us.

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which IANA must complete.

The document creates a single new top-level registry called "Content Security Policy Directives." IANA will accordingly create a new category of the same name at http://www.iana.org/protocols. If that name should be broadened to accommodate future related registries, please let us know.

The new registry is managed via the Specification Required policy defined by RFC 5226. These are the initial registrations:

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Directive Name | Reference |
+-----------------+----------------------------------------------+
| base-uri | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| child-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| connect-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| default-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| font-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| form-action | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| frame-ancestors | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| frame-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| img-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| media-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| object-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| plugin-types | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| report-uri | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| sandbox | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| script-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
| style-src | [ https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/ ] |
+-----------------+----------------------------------------------+

IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document.

Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed.
2015-10-15
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Aaron Falk
2015-10-15
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Aaron Falk
2015-10-15
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Robert Sparks
2015-10-15
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Robert Sparks
2015-10-14
03 (System) Notify list changed from draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg.ad@ietf.org, mkwst@google.com, mnot@mnot.net, draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg@ietf.org to (None)
2015-10-12
03 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2015-10-12
03 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (Content Security Policy Directive Registry) to …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (Content Security Policy Directive Registry) to Informational RFC


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Content Security Policy Directive Registry'
  as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-11-09. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  This document establishes an Internet Assigned Number Authority
  (IANA) registry for Content Security Policy directives.  It populates
  the registry with the directives defined in the CSP specification.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


2015-10-12
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2015-10-12
03 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba Last call was requested
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba Last call announcement was generated
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba Ballot approval text was generated
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba Ballot writeup was changed
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba
1. Summary

Mark Nottingham is Document Shepherd; Barry Leiba is responsible Area
Director.

This document establishes an Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA)
registry for Content …
1. Summary

Mark Nottingham is Document Shepherd; Barry Leiba is responsible Area
Director.

This document establishes an Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA)
registry for Content Security Policy directives.  It populates the
registry with the directives defined in the CSP specification.

The target status is Informational.

2. Review and Consensus

This is an AD-sponsored draft to establish a registry for CSP
directives. CSP is defined by the W3C, a product of its consensus
process and widely deployed. Discussion of this draft in the IETF will
occur in Last Call.

3. Intellectual Property

The author has stated that to his direct, personal knowledge, all IPR
related to this document has been disclosed.

4. Other Points

This document does not make downward references.
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba Ballot writeup was generated
2015-10-11
03 Barry Leiba IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2015-10-11
03 Mark Nottingham Changed document writeup
2015-10-07
03 Mike West New version available: draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-03.txt
2015-10-07
02 Barry Leiba Shepherding AD changed to Barry Leiba
2015-10-07
02 Barry Leiba Notification list changed to "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
2015-10-07
02 Barry Leiba Document shepherd changed to Mark Nottingham
2015-10-07
02 Barry Leiba Intended Status changed to Informational from None
2015-10-07
02 Barry Leiba Stream changed to IETF from None
2015-10-07
02 Mike West New version available: draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-02.txt
2015-10-07
01 Mike West New version available: draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-01.txt
2015-10-06
00 Mike West New version available: draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-00.txt