Mobility Considerations for 6LoWPAN
draft-williams-6lowpan-mob-03
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Geoffrey C. Mulligan , Carl Williams , David Huo | ||
| Last updated | 2010-07-12 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There has been discussion recently within the 6LoWPAN community regarding mobile usage scenarios. Mobility considerations is required for the deployment of SmartGrids. The mobility analysis for SmartGrid and 6lowpan deployment is required to ensure proper performance for the mobile usage cases. Also, mobility in 6LoWPAN sensor networks may present unique challenges to the 6LoWPAN architecture. Hence it is best to have mobility as a consideration upfront rather than an after thought in the development of 6LoWPAN milestones. This document provides a mobility perspective to the 6LoWPAN sensor network architecture.
Authors
Geoffrey C. Mulligan
Carl Williams
David Huo
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)