Survey of P2P File Downloading and Streaming Protocol
draft-wu-ppsp-survey-of-p2p-protocol-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Kent Kangheng Wu , James Lei , Dah Chiu | ||
| Last updated | 2010-11-07 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Most of Peer-to-Peer survey papers are described about the P2P applications architecture. But it is hard to compare PPSP with them with the high-level description. In this survey, we focus on the message design for the well-known P2P file downloading and streaming applications (Bittorrent and eMule) and study their base and enhancement approach in the peer and tracker protocol specifications. Through the survey, we summarize a common message design for the P2P streaming protocol standardization.
Authors
Kent Kangheng Wu
James Lei
Dah Chiu
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)