The analysis of tools selection for broadband ISPs
draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-tools-selection-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | GuoLiang Yang | ||
| Last updated | 2011-07-11 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
NAT444, DS-LITE, 6RD and other transition technologies have been well done, the ISP should select the most suitable tool to meet the requirements of a typical broadband access network in the real world regarding its network architecture, operation situation and transition goals, etc. According to the mainstream broadband access network, this draft focuses on analyzing the problems that may be encountered when using various transitional technologies during the transition and finally introduces a more systematic and operational proposal.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)