EAP Authentication Identity Protection

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-04-19 (latest revision 2017-10-10)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at


The EAP framework does not provide an effective way to protect the peer's identity. This creates the risk of identity forgery. This document revisits the EAP identity protection problem, and proposes a solution to this problem via the use of Cryptographically Binding Identity (CBID).


Zhen Cao (zhencao.ietf@gmail.com)
Dapeng Liu (max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com)
Minpeng Qi (qiminpeng@chinamobile.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)