Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Read Entry Controls
draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2005-07-12
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2005-06-27
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2005-06-27
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2005-06-27
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2005-06-27
|
04 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Amy Vezza |
2005-06-24
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-06-23
|
04 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
2005-06-23
|
04 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-06-22
|
04 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-06-22
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-06-21
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2005-06-21
|
04 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
2005-06-17
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] Editorial points from review by Scott Brim: ... Some text suggestions: If the update operation fails (in either normal or control … [Ballot comment] Editorial points from review by Scott Brim: ... Some text suggestions: If the update operation fails (in either normal or control processing), no response control is provided. I know this means that no response control is provided for the post-read request, but as a naive reader I had to stop and think whether that meant no response was provided to the update request at all. Not knowing the protocol well, it's hard for me to suggest an improvement, but consider adding "to the post-read request control". The Pre-Read and Post-Read controls may be combined with each other and/or with a variety of other controls. When combined with the assertion control [Assertion] and/or the manageDsaIT control [RFC3296], the semantics of each control included in the combination apply. The Pre-Read and Post-Read controls may be combined with other controls as detailed in other technical specifications. You could delete the last sentence, which is somewhat redundant, if you added "as detailed in other specifications" to the first sentence. The controls defined in this document extend update operations to support read capabilities. Servers MUST ensure that the client is authorized both for reading of the information provided in this control in addition to ensuring the client is authorized to perform the requested directory update. That last sentence has too much in it and probably isn't English. How about "Servers MUST ensure that the client is authorized both to read the information provided in this control and to perform the requested directory update"? A small nit: sometimes it says "a LDAP control" and sometimes "an LDAP control". |
2005-06-17
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-06-16
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-06-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie |
2005-06-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie |
2005-06-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-06-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Telechat date was changed to 2005-06-23 from by Ted Hardie |
2005-06-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-06-23 by Ted Hardie |
2005-06-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Ted Hardie |
2005-06-10
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2005-05-31
|
04 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register a LDAP Object Identifier in the following registr: SMI Network Management Directory … IANA Last Call Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register a LDAP Object Identifier in the following registr: SMI Network Management Directory Codes found at http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers. IANA will also register 2 LDAP Protocol Mechanisms found at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters. |
2005-05-13
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-05-13
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-05-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ted Hardie |
2005-05-13
|
04 | Ted Hardie | Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie |
2005-05-13
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-05-13
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-05-13
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state Publication Requested |
2005-02-14
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-04.txt |
2004-10-29
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-03.txt |
2004-02-16
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-02.txt |
2003-10-28
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-01.txt |
2003-06-23
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-00.txt |