Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-billon-expires-06
review-billon-expires-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2022-12-05-00

Request Review of draft-billon-expires
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-12-27
Requested 2022-11-29
Authors Benjamin BILLON , John R. Levine
I-D last updated 2022-12-05
Completed reviews Artart Last Call review of -06 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -07 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris M. Lonvick
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-billon-expires by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yP-dGkARqgGYZGWWSt1xlzSwyqk
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-12-05
review-billon-expires-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2022-12-05-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

I'd like to suggest that the authors consider recommending that a mechanism to
protect the header be utilized if there is a concern that a malicious attacker
may surreptitiously attempt to change the value of the Expires header field.
The authors will likely know what mechanisms may be used better than me.

Best regards,
Chris