Last Call Review of draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-
review-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-genart-lc-carpenter-2011-11-18-00

Request Review of draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2011-12-07
Requested 2011-11-12
Authors Rainer Gerhards, Chris Lonvick
Draft last updated 2011-11-18
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Brian Carpenter
Genart Telechat review of -?? by Brian Carpenter
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Brian Carpenter
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Brian Carpenter
Assignment Reviewer Brian Carpenter 
State Completed
Review review-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-genart-lc-carpenter-2011-11-18
Review completed: 2011-11-18

Review
review-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-genart-lc-carpenter-2011-11-18

Please see attached review.


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-11.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2011-11-18
IETF LC End Date: 2011-12-07
IESG Telechat date: 

Summary:  Almost ready
--------

Comment:
--------

This seems to be very useful documentation of legacy practice, and it seems like a good
idea to register a port number for it.

Minor issue:
------------

6.  IANA Considerations

--> needs an introductory sentence asking for a Registered TCP port according to the
following description.

         Service Name - syslog-tcp
         Transport Protocol - TCP
         Assignee - IESG <iesg at ietf.org>
         Contact - IETF Chair <chair at ietf.org>
         Description - syslog protocol (RFC 5424) over TCP
         Reference - This document
         Port Number - 10514

--> actually that should be <TBD> for consistency with section 3.3.

   Note to the IANA - we're making an assumption that this document
   needs to be compliant with Section 8.1.1. of RFC 6335.  If so, then
   the above table is our best guess.  We'd also like to use 10514/tcp
   for this protocol as syslog over udp is assigned 514.

--> this note should be tagged for removal by the RFC Editor


Nits
----

3.4.2.  Non-Transparing-Framing

s/Transparing/Transparent/