Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-sids-05
review-ietf-6man-sids-05-intdir-telechat-zuniga-2024-01-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-sids
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2024-01-26
Requested 2024-01-18
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Suresh Krishnan
I-D last updated 2024-10-21 (Latest revision 2024-02-15)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Telechat review of -05 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Juan-Carlos Zúñiga (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Yingzhen Qu (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -03 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Comments 
As many intdir reviewers have already reviewed this I-D during the 6MAN WG last call, please select another reviewer to get a fresh pair of eyes. Thanks.
Assignment Reviewer Juan-Carlos Zúñiga
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-sids by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/0Wnl4MSHap7iHNk0L66aGtYqQ9g
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-01-30
review-ietf-6man-sids-05-intdir-telechat-zuniga-2024-01-30-00
Reviewer: Juan Carlos Zuniga
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-6man-sids>. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

Based on my review, if I were on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO
OBJECTION.

Summary: The document is intended to explain the use of SRv6 SIDs within 
the IPv6 Addressing Architecture.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues:

Abstract/Introduction:
The Abstract mentions briefly that the document allocates a Global Unicast
Prefix for SIDs. This is not mentioned in the Introduction though. Since this is 
a major contribution of the document, I suggest adding some more text in the 
Introduction about the usefulness of this allocation.

Best, 

Juan Carlos