Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-02
review-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-02-genart-lc-mishra-2024-11-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-11-11
Requested 2024-10-21
Authors Jonathan Hui
I-D last updated 2024-11-21
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Gyan Mishra
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Shivan Kaul Sahib
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Adrian Farrel
Iotdir Telechat review of -02 by Thomas Fossati
Intdir Telechat review of -02 by Juan-Carlos Zúñiga
Assignment Reviewer Gyan Mishra
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kuJ8yuOABb3jEmEEdHTc7bV4RD8
Reviewed revision 02
Result Ready
Completed 2024-11-21
review-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-02-genart-lc-mishra-2024-11-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-??
Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review Date: 2024-11-21
IETF LC End Date: 2024-11-11
IESG Telechat date: 2024-12-05

Summary:

This document defines a new flag, the SNAC Router flag, in the Router
Advertisement message that can be used to distinguish configuration information
sent by SNAC routers from information sent by infrastructure routers. This flag
is used only by SNAC routers and is ignored by all other devices.

This draft is very simple and to the point and is ready for publication.
I believe this be flag will be very useful in helping identify SNAC routers in
the SOHO network.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None

Nits/editorial comments:
None