Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-14
review-ietf-acme-integrations-14-dnsdir-lc-lemon-2023-06-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Last Call Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2023-06-09
Requested 2023-05-26
Authors Owen Friel , Richard Barnes , Rifaat Shekh-Yusef , Michael Richardson
I-D last updated 2023-06-05
Completed reviews Dnsdir Last Call review of -14 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -15 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -16 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -12 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -12 by John R. Levine (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Bo Wu (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Tim Evens (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -13 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -13 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ted Lemon
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-acme-integrations by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/oqwJAE9r-PjcSRBMVKyVAyH5mO4
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-06-05
review-ietf-acme-integrations-14-dnsdir-lc-lemon-2023-06-05-00
In my previous review, I noted a few points that were not addressed from my
first review of the document during IETF last call. None of these points have
since been addressed. As I said in the previous review, these were all nits,
and so I don't think there's any need to address them. However, I will point
out that several area directors asked for these nits to be addressed.

With that said, I think the document is useful and does what it's intended to
do, so I believe it is ready for publication and don't personally see any
reason to delay it further.