Last Call Review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07
review-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07-opsdir-lc-martinez-2018-01-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-11-26
Requested 2017-11-12
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Magnus Nystrom (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -07 by Francesca Palombini (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Matthew Miller (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -07 by Yoshifumi Nishida (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Carlos Martínez
Review review-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07-opsdir-lc-martinez-2018-01-10
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/Tnq7bvq4Z7sNHvse0o8cM6HVgaI
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2018-01-10
Review completed: 2018-01-10

Review
review-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07-opsdir-lc-martinez-2018-01-10

Reviewer: Carlos Martinez
Review Result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments  just like any other last call comments.

I found this document well-written, informative and easy to read. I believe it to be READY for publication as an informational document.

From an editorial pov tt does have numerous typos and sometimes uses colloquial language which IMO would be best if changed into more formal prose. Other reviewers have already pointed this out as well.

From a technical point of view, the only aspect that I feel could be worth reconsidering is whether considering very complex use cases involving IPv4-to-IPv6 conversions really makes sense. Such complexity could very well offset the advantages obtained from applying the ACP to the particular problem of network management. Again, this is not an "issue" in the document since it's more related to my opinion on the matter.

My thanks go to the authors for a very informative and nice to read document.

/Carlos