Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14
review-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14-opsdir-lc-zhou-2016-12-12-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-12-06 | |
| Requested | 2016-11-23 | |
| Authors | Matthew Kerwin | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-03-30 (Latest revision 2016-12-15) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Barry Leiba (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Tianran Zhou (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tianran Zhou |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-12-12 |
review-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14-opsdir-lc-zhou-2016-12-12-00
Hi Authors, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document reviewed: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14 Summary: - This document specifies the file URI scheme. - I do not see any specific operations or management aspects that need special considerations. So from an OPS-DIR point of view, I think this doc is ready for publication as RFC. Editorial Comments: In section 6, please expand the acronym LWP. Also better to expand API (Application Programming Interface). Although the terms may be reasonably well know, not everyone may know. Regards, Tianran