Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-payload-registry-03
review-ietf-avtcore-rtp-payload-registry-03-secdir-lc-hardaker-2024-09-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-payload-registry
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-10-07
Requested 2024-09-23
Authors Magnus Westerlund
I-D last updated 2024-09-30
Completed reviews Genart Early review of -02 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Wes Hardaker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Wes Hardaker
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-payload-registry by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ckDREJ_C2Ne4kFsZAp5MCtexVa0
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-09-30
review-ietf-avtcore-rtp-payload-registry-03-secdir-lc-hardaker-2024-09-30-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is: ready

The document is well written, and short and to the point -- thanks for the good
work!

A couple of minor points:

- it would be good to expand RTP on first use (even if it's common)
- For the updated sentence in section 3, saying "by requesting that IANA
register that media name" -- it would be helpful to explicitly list the table
name for the registry.

That's it!  Probably my shortest secdir review write up ever.