Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10
review-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10-genart-lc-haddad-2013-11-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-10-22
Requested 2013-10-10
Authors Marc Petit-Huguenin , Glen Zorn
I-D last updated 2013-11-20
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Wassim Haddad (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by David Harrington (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -10 by Fred Baker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Wassim Haddad
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2013-11-20
review-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10-genart-lc-haddad-2013-11-20-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,

please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10

Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad

Review Date: 20 Nov 2013

IETF LC End Date: 22 Oct 2013

IETF Telechat Date: 21 Nov 2013

Summary:  This draft is almost ready for publication as proposed standard

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues:

-> In the introduction section, I suggest re-wording the following (long and
not so clear) sentence:

"Schulzrinne, et al. [RFC3550] lists using multiple clock rates as one of the
reasons to not use different payloads on the same SSRC but unfortunately this
advice has not always been followed and some RTP implementations change the
payload in the same SSRC even if the different payloads use different clock
rates".

-> Please consider adding the following to the terminology section:

- SSRC,

- Lip,

- SR

Regards,

Wassim H.