Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10
review-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10-genart-lc-haddad-2013-11-20-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-10-22 | |
Requested | 2013-10-10 | |
Authors | Marc Petit-Huguenin , Glen Zorn | |
I-D last updated | 2013-11-20 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10
by Wassim Haddad
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by David Harrington (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -10 by Fred Baker (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Wassim Haddad |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2013-11-20 |
review-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10-genart-lc-haddad-2013-11-20-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: 20 Nov 2013 IETF LC End Date: 22 Oct 2013 IETF Telechat Date: 21 Nov 2013 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as proposed standard - Major Issues: None - Minor Issues: -> In the introduction section, I suggest re-wording the following (long and not so clear) sentence: "Schulzrinne, et al. [RFC3550] lists using multiple clock rates as one of the reasons to not use different payloads on the same SSRC but unfortunately this advice has not always been followed and some RTP implementations change the payload in the same SSRC even if the different payloads use different clock rates". -> Please consider adding the following to the terminology section: - SSRC, - Lip, - SR Regards, Wassim H.