Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07
review-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2019-03-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-04-01 | |
| Requested | 2019-03-11 | |
| Authors | Ravi Singh , Kireeti Kompella , Senad Palislamovic | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-03-31 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06
by Acee Lindem
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Watson Ladd (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2019-03-31 |
review-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2019-03-31-00
I read the document and think it is ready. IDNits warnings and comments are easily/automatically fixed when new version is submitted. I only have few editorial nits/suggestions. * Section 5.1 says "Assuming the below specified network topology.." while it could also use an exact reference to Figure 1. * Section 5 is written so that it assumed the reader has already read Section 6. Maybe swapping Sections 5 and 6 order would make sense?