Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08
review-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08-genart-lc-halpern-2022-10-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-10-18
Requested 2022-10-04
Authors Parag Jain , Ali Sajassi , Samer Salam , Sami Boutros , Greg Mirsky
I-D last updated 2022-10-07
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -08 by Wesley Eddy (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -08 by Di Ma (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/o65AsTa-IlE5tq5kZy_2kZ80bfE
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-10-07
review-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08-genart-lc-halpern-2022-10-07-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2022-10-07
IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-18
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments:
    Should the RDs in section 6.1 and 6.2 use example IP addresses instead of
    1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2?  (ID Nits called my attention to this, and I could not
    decide if it was important.  So it is a nit here.)