Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-
review-ietf-cdni-use-cases-secdir-lc-johansson-2012-07-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2012-07-17 | |
Requested | 2012-06-28 | |
Authors | Gilles Bertrand , Stephan Emile , Trevor Burbridge , Philip Eardley , Kevin J. Ma , Grant Watson | |
I-D last updated | 2012-07-13 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Suresh Krishnan
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Leif Johansson |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Leif Johansson |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2012-07-13 |
review-ietf-cdni-use-cases-secdir-lc-johansson-2012-07-13-00
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document is well written. The security considerations section refers the reader to the CDNI problem statement which is fine if all the security considerations from RFC3570 (which is obsoleted by this document) are carried over to the CDNI problem statement. Best R Leif -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/56bkACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZneEEACfSx3EDC8LjfxAVtjlG26U0yke A/4AniNhNV6H7bR5HCqfisT2mZ2lFgp0 =UlPC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----