Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-genart-lc-dupont-2012-04-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2012-04-10 | |
| Requested | 2012-03-29 | |
| Authors | D. R. Evans , Ralph Droms , Sheng Jiang | |
| Draft last updated | 2012-04-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -?? by
Francis Dupont
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Tobias Gondrom |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-genart-lc-dupont-2012-04-11
|
|
| Completed | 2012-04-11 |
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-genart-lc-dupont-2012-04-11-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-09.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20120407 IETF LC End Date: 20120412 IESG Telechat date: 20120412 Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Note I know very well DHCPv6 so some details could have been too obvious for me... - Abstract page 1: RFC 3315 -> RFC 3315 (DHCPv6) - Introduction page 4: msg-type -> message type - Introduction page 4: I'd like to get a better name for T1 but as far as I know it has no name, so I propose: T1 -> the timer T1. - 5 page 6: I don't understand (i.e., wording problem) "ignores" in: ... If the client does not receive a response from the server by the end of the retransmission process, the client ignores and discards the Reconfigure message. - 7 page 6: IMHO the fake Reconfigure message is already a known threat (but I have no concern to see it explained again) Thanks Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr