Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-genart-lc-dupont-2012-04-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-04-10
Requested 2012-03-29
Authors D. R. Evans , Ralph Droms , Sheng Jiang
Draft last updated 2012-04-11
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Tobias Gondrom
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-genart-lc-dupont-2012-04-11
Completed 2012-04-11
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-genart-lc-dupont-2012-04-11-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< 

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20120407
IETF LC End Date: 20120412
IESG Telechat date: 20120412

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Note I know very well DHCPv6 so some details could have been too obvious for me...

 - Abstract page 1: RFC 3315 -> RFC 3315 (DHCPv6)

 - Introduction page 4: msg-type -> message type

 - Introduction page 4: I'd like to get a better name for T1 but as far as I know it has
 no name, so I propose: T1 -> the timer T1.

 - 5 page 6: I don't understand (i.e., wording problem) "ignores" in:

   ... If the client
   does not receive a response from the server by the end of the
   retransmission process, the client ignores and discards the
   Reconfigure message.

 - 7 page 6: IMHO the fake Reconfigure message is already a known threat (but I have
  no concern to see it explained again)

Thanks

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr