Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
review-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-04-04-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

 .



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.



Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2013-04-03

IETF LC End Date: 2013-04-03

IESG Telechat date: N/A



Summary:

This draft is almost ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some
editorial comments.



Nits/editorial comments:

- Reading the abstract does not tell why these options are necessary. The 4th
paragraph in Intro mentions the purpose of these options as well as Section 8.

Please consider adding a similar sentence as Section 8 to the abstract:

"The proposed extensions allow the signaling of new algorithm uptake in client
code to allow zone administrators to know when it is possible to complete an
algorithm rollover in a DNSSEC signed zone."



-[Page 4], last sentence: "in a potential future example". Suggestion: "in
potential future examples".



-[Page 7], Section 9, [I-D.ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0], latest version is 10.



Best Regards,

Meral



---

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson

Research

www.ericsson.com