Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06
review-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06-dnsdir-telechat-mevzek-2025-02-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2025-02-18
Requested 2025-01-17
Authors Shumon Huque , Christian Elmerot , Ólafur Guðmundsson
I-D last updated 2025-03-10 (Latest revision 2025-02-27)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -01 by Nicolai Leymann (diff)
Secdir Early review of -04 by Brian Weis (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Patrick Mevzek (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -06 by Patrick Mevzek (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by Antoine Fressancourt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Patrick Mevzek
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/7viw9Iu-TdXzb9zy9ISFOziI9mk
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-02-02
review-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06-dnsdir-telechat-mevzek-2025-02-02-00
I have reviewed previously draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-05
at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/pSqTcLhunIAULyz4v8ByXhp7cWg/
It was "Ready with Nits".

Looking at version 06 now,
the major points I raised have now been addressed by this version,
so I thank the authors for that and their further explanations in the mailing-list.

I believe the document is tighter and clearer with this version.

No other substantiative change in this new version after my previous review
(besides the expansion to cover NSEC3, which was one of the point I raised in review),
so I believe this version makes the document
now in Ready state from my point of view.

PS: you still however have a dangling ( I think now in §7.2 starting at:
"(e.g., Minimally Covering NSEC"
Probably put a ) right after NSEC?
If there is another new version for the draft for other reasons, please try to fix that
very minor point that does not warrant a new version just for itself.