Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06
review-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06-intdir-telechat-fressancourt-2025-02-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2025-02-14
Requested 2025-02-04
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Shumon Huque , Christian Elmerot , Ólafur Guðmundsson
I-D last updated 2025-03-10 (Latest revision 2025-02-27)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -01 by Nicolai Leymann (diff)
Secdir Early review of -04 by Brian Weis (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Patrick Mevzek (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -06 by Patrick Mevzek (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by Antoine Fressancourt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Antoine Fressancourt
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/8lJkK6yoAs9LAYc9EKMSu_t54Gs
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-02-10
review-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06-intdir-telechat-fressancourt-2025-02-10-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06.txt. These comments were
written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document
editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat
comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other
Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT
Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as YES or
NO OBJECTION.

The document is very clearly written, and understandable.

A (very) minor remark I have about the document is that, regarding the
presentation of the DNS record, I would better present how those records are
structured (Which field is where), for instance in sections 3.1, 3.4 or 4.
Besides, the DNS record example in section 4 is not readable in printed
versions of the document (Yes, I am old school).