Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04
review-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04-secdir-lc-turner-2017-04-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-04-13 | |
| Requested | 2017-03-30 | |
| Authors | Andrew Sullivan | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-09-21 (Latest revision 2017-01-03) | |
| Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -04
by Bernie Volz
Iotdir Early review of -04 by Ines Robles Opsdir Early review of -04 by Jürgen Schönwälder Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Robert Sparks Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Sean Turner Artart Telechat review of -04 by Eliot Lear |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sean Turner |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-04-11 |
review-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04-secdir-lc-turner-2017-04-11-00
The draft is short and well written. The security considerations is also brief, but I agree with its basic point "This memo presents some requirements for future development, but does not specify anything." The persistent "visual confusability" consideration wrt internationalized domain names is duly noted as a consideration. In my opinion, the security considerations as written is appropriate and sufficient; other DNSSD WG protocol-focused drafts have more extensive security considerations and it is better to grind the security axe against those documents rather than here.