Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14
review-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14-artart-telechat-turner-2021-08-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2021-08-10 | |
| Requested | 2021-07-24 | |
| Authors | Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Mohamed Boucadair , Jon Shallow | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-08-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -11
by Radia Perlman
(diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -11 by Ebben Aries (diff) Genart Last Call review of -11 by David Schinazi (diff) Artart Telechat review of -14 by Sean Turner |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sean Turner |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/XPkObFp8WqvmVbaqF8Rw9iDB1C4 | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2021-08-11 |
review-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14-artart-telechat-turner-2021-08-11-00
Hi! Reviewing this because I got asked. I will note that it appears this document has already been through IETF LC, SECDIR, and GENART among others. These two are pretty minor (and look like a secret secdir review): 1. I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis refers to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13}. Should this I-D also refer to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13} in s1? Pretty sure changing the reference isn't going to slow down publication because this I-D normatively references I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis. 2. Assuming that the answer is yes and you could use (D)TLS1.3 with this protocol, I think you need to say something about or refer to the early data concerns (see s7.2 of I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis). You might consider just expand the 2nd sentence in the 1st para of s8 to also refer to s7.2 or I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis?