Last Call Review of draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05
review-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05-genart-lc-carpenter-2013-01-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-01-25 | |
Requested | 2013-01-17 | |
Authors | Andy Bierman , Dan Romascanu , Juergen Quittek , Mouli Chandramouli | |
I-D last updated | 2013-01-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Brian E. Carpenter Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Vincent Roca (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian E. Carpenter |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2013-01-19 |
review-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05-genart-lc-carpenter-2013-01-19-00
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2013-01-19 IETF LC End Date: 2013-01-25 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready (nits) -------- Comment: -------- I didn't find any mention of a MIB Doctor review in the tracker. Since two authors are MIB Doctors, it should be OK. I did not review the details of the MIB module. Nits: ----- In the Abstract, "This document specifies version of the Entity MIB" seems to lack a "4". I would have expected a short paragraph starting "Version 4 of this MIB addresses new requirements... " just before section 2.1.