Last Call Review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-04
review-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-04-secdir-lc-smyslov-2024-02-04-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-02-15 | |
| Requested | 2024-02-01 | |
| Authors | Marco Bettini | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-02-04 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -04
by Valery Smyslov
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -04 by Scott Hollenbeck (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Artart Telechat review of -05 by Scott Hollenbeck (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Valery Smyslov |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/oCb1Opfotohyv5ZTEY7wzvkVS24 | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-02-04 |
review-ietf-extra-imap-inprogress-04-secdir-lc-smyslov-2024-02-04-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft defines a new IMAP response code for a standard way to represent a progress of long server operations. The draft is well written and easy to understand. I found no security problems with this draft.