Last Call Review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-01
review-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-01-secdir-lc-nir-2024-03-10-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-03-15 | |
Requested | 2024-03-01 | |
Authors | Kenneth Murchison , Bron Gondwana | |
I-D last updated | 2024-03-10 | |
Completed reviews |
Artart Last Call review of -01
by Barry Leiba
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Yoav Nir (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Yoav Nir |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Gh4M7UwgINNhU-ZFCW3dIq7UFLg | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2024-03-10 |
review-ietf-extra-imap-list-metadata-01-secdir-lc-nir-2024-03-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document is short and well-written. The security considerations section is also short enough for me to copy it here: This specification does not introduce any additional security concerns beyond those described in [RFC5258]. RFC5258 is the RFC that describes LIST extensions in general. However, this document does not just describe a generic extension. It describes an extension to make the LIST command response contain the mailbox metadata. RFC 5464 which describes mailbox metadata has a Security Considerations section, and its content applies here. So I suggest to replace "those described in [RFC5258]." with "those described in [RFC5258] and [RFC5464]."