IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-12
review-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-12-genart-lc-korhonen-2025-10-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-10-24 | |
| Requested | 2025-10-10 | |
| Authors | Mukul Srivastava , Yisong Liu , Changwang Lin , Jinming Li | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-12-15 (Latest revision 2025-12-03) | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -12
by Giuseppe Fioccola
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -12 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Bruno Decraene (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/u9FNZASL-OYWG-SSF0-1iou5o9w | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 17) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-10-26 |
review-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-12-genart-lc-korhonen-2025-10-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-12 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2025-10-26 IETF LC End Date: 2025-10-24 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: My reading of the draft is that it is ready. I cannot claim prior experience with BMP (and had to read few supporting RFCs to understand the context a bit better), thus I may have missed some corners in the current draft. Major issues: None. Minor issues: Some of the new Stat Types, like 18, 19 and 22 sound like they were updating RFC7854. Should this be reflected? I did see older versions of the draft actually had the "updates" statement, but it has been removed since -07. Any particular reason for that? Nits/editorial comments: None.