Telechat Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05
review-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-10-23-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-10-21 | |
| Requested | 2023-10-14 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Tommy Pauly | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-01-31 (Latest revision 2023-12-13) | |
| Completed reviews |
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -05
by Jim Reid
(diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Menachem Dodge (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Susan Hares (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Claudio Allocchio (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Brian Haberman (diff) |
|
| Comments |
Please note the very short-term deadline for this IESG telechat. Thank you in advance -éric |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Haberman |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/v9IhwKIA4XR4K4qB3Cp3K55aMdg | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | On the right track | |
| Completed | 2023-10-23 |
review-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-10-23-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. Major Issues: I am a bit concerned that there is no discussion about the potential scope for either domain names or IP addresses. What happens if a proxy sits behind a NAT? Does the NAT now need an ALG to convert private IP addresses to global ones? What about a situation where the proxy sits behind a firewall utilizing split DNS?