Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07
review-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07-secdir-lc-montville-2018-08-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-08-14
Requested 2018-07-31
Authors Emily Stark
I-D last updated 2022-06-07 (Latest revision 2018-12-09)
Completed reviews Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Qin Wu (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Adam W. Montville
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-08-10
review-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07-secdir-lc-montville-2018-08-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The summary of the review is that this document is ready.

Nits/comments from GENART and/or OPS reviews not repeated - I really didn't
notice any nits beyond those. I felt that the document read rather well, and
that the security and privacy considerations covered what needed to be covered.
 That said, the first paragraph of Section 4 (Security Considerations) could
have a subsection of its own "Hostile Header Attacks", which would give the
draft three, clear security considerations - Hostile Header Attacks, Maximum
max-age, and Avoiding amplification attacks.