Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-16
review-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-16-opsdir-lc-wu-2023-02-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2023-02-20
Requested 2023-02-06
Authors Annabelle Backman , Justin Richer , Manu Sporny
I-D last updated 2023-02-21
Completed reviews Secdir Telechat review of -17 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -17 by Harald T. Alvestrand (diff)
Secdir Early review of -05 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -16 by Harald T. Alvestrand (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Bo Wu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -16 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Bo Wu
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/nE2BdsK0TI8iqSxfRqkBnOpLxZM
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 19)
Result Has nits
Completed 2023-02-21
review-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-16-opsdir-lc-wu-2023-02-21-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as an ops reviewer. This is a well written
document.

Some editorial nits:
1. Section 1.3 s/obs-folds/obs-fold
2. Section 2: s/Signture/Signature
3. Remove redundant "the":
  Section 2.1.3  If the value of the the HTTP field in question
  Section 4.1.  The member's key is the label that uniquely identifies the
  message signature within the the HTTP message
4. 7.4.2  s/cacheing/caching

Thanks,
Bo Wu