Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10
review-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10-artart-lc-paine-2022-05-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
Deadline | 2022-05-13 | |
Requested | 2022-04-28 | |
Authors | Ketan Talaulikar , Peter Psenak , Jeff Tantsura | |
I-D last updated | 2022-05-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -04
by Andy Smith
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -05 by Paul Wouters (diff) Opsdir Early review of -04 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Himanshu C. Shah (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Russ Housley (diff) Artart Last Call review of -10 by Kirsty Paine (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Kirsty Paine |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Gp7TtdCUrbmf6WJy4ATcmN_DYQI | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-05-09 |
review-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10-artart-lc-paine-2022-05-09-00
This draft is clear, well-written and I find only one minor issue as follows: - Abstract: It takes a while until the abstract tells me what the document does and it doesn't cover the full scope of what it documents. I would move the last sentence to the start, and then explain the backstory/specifics if it's still needed, and include the information in the last paragraph of Section 1. This will help interested readers find your draft and its relevance to them more quickly.